~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~



    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 19, 2017 3:04 pm
    Published on Apr 12, 2017
    Seth Rich Was Sitting Up, Talking at Hospital, Died Hour Forty Minutes After Being Shot
    Day 171.9 Hillary's Hackers, Awan Brothers Saga Deepens, Part 9

    There was also a report of a blacked out , black SUV stopped by DC police, one mile from the shooting that morning . The report said 2 FBI agents , with automatic weapons were questioned and released. The report disappeared the next day.
    Day 208.2 Hillary's Hackers, Awan Brothers Saga Deepens Part 2
    Published on May 19, 2017
    Wikileaks Trio and DNC Duo Are Really Wikileaks 5. Eric Braverman the Powerball for Wiki 6?

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 19, 2017 4:07 pm
    WATCH: Private Detective Reveals the 1 Mistake Seth Rich’s Killers Made

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Sat May 20, 2017 3:00 pm
    Trump Could Become The Greatest #UNRIG President Of Our Time?
    - Robert David Steele Interview

    Comment: Trump is playing the system against itself. The system will self implode by suicide. P...... Gate is the key to extending the rope to let these people hang themselves. Comy Is a pulled plug on the swamp. Now Hillary, Bill and the rest of the government is no longer protected from prosecution. Trump is making agreements with other countries (China, Russia) for a silk road trade agreement, using the gold standard.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Sat May 20, 2017 4:38 pm


    The Inside Story on James B. Comey
    Posted on May 18, 2017 by State of the Nation
    Former FBI Director the Ultimate Inside Man

    Subject: Dropping the Hammer on Comey… Brilliant!

    There are very few crime/mystery novels that approach this true story for compelling drama, intrigue and brinkmanship (with the nation in the balance).

    Don’t believe the fake-media story that Trump made a mistake or huge gaffe by firing Comey.
    Don’t believe the media narrative from the left that it was an attempt to silence Comey from some investigation into Trump.
    Don’t believe the RINO narrative that Comey is a good guy just trying to do his job in terrible circumstances and the timing was bad.
    Don’t believe the lie that Comey was admired and respected by career FBI investigators and agents.
    Don’t believe the lie that Trump’s “tweets” are not professional and have no strategic purpose. His tweets are weaponized and deadly.

    James Comey is a poisonous snake of the highest order… a deep-water Swamp Denizen who has been highly paid to deliberately provide cover for high-level corruption by the Clintons and Obama. He is has been central to trying to destroy the Trump campaign and then the Trump administration from the start. He is as dirty as they come in DC. He had highest-level cover (the FBI no less) and was deep into an effort to eliminate Trump. Trump had to move hard, fast, and at exactly the right time to cut the head off the snake without getting bitten by the snake or being finished by the other swamp denizens.

    Begin by noticing how the President fired Comey when Comey was 3,000 miles away from his office, that Comey had no inkling he was being cut, that all his files, computers, and everything in his office were seized by his boss Sessions and the justice department. This was not a violation of protocol, it was tactical. Notice how Prez Trump compartmentalized the strike and did not inform any of his White House “staff” to prevent leaks. Notice how he emasculated Comey and the swamp denizens by letting them know in a tweet that the Attorney General got information (surveillance “tapes” from the seizure of Comey’s office) to let Comey and his handlers know that Trump’s DOJ has the goods on them. This was a brilliant, strategic and totally imperative move at exactly the right time against horrible, evil and corrupt powers infesting our government.

    The swamp is on notice that the President is on to them, they are sweating bullets because their criminal games of corruption are being pursued and they know it. They are screaming and ranting because they are desperate denizens of the swamp who are beginning to realize they are roadkill.

    THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE COMEY SCAM. Taken from credible public sources (readily available if you want to look or want me to sent them to you), with a few reasonable “fill in the blank” conclusions of my own.

    The Highlights:

    Comey was a minor assistant US attorney in the late 90’s. He only gained power and money by being the DOJ official who “investigated” and cleared Bill Clinton of any wrong-doing in Clinton’s totally corrupt pardon (for huge payoffs) of criminal financier Marc Rich as Clinton was leaving the Presidency. This is how Comey began his career as a creature of the “swamp” years ago, as a servant of the Clintons.

    Comey provided “cover” for the Clintons in their gaining incredible power and wealth after leaving office through pardoning a billionaire money-launderer, arms dealer and criminal. Comey was a key piece in how the Clintons upped their corruption game and gained incredible wealth through their foundation after leaving the White House. A huge part of the scheme was giving Marc Rich a free pass when he should have spent life in prison, and that is what Comey covered-up for the Clintons. This set up Comey to be part of the corruption machine, making him powerful and wealthy.

    Immediately after doing the Clinton’s dirty work as a DOJ official, Comey resigned from the DOJ and took a position as the head attorney (Counsel) of the Lockheed Martin company, a huge military contractor. While he was in that position Lockheed became a major contributor (millions) to the Clinton Foundation and its fake charity spin-offs. In return for these payment to Clinton Inc., Lockheed received huge contracts with Hillary’s state department. Comey was the chief legal officer of Lockheed throughout this period of contributions to Clinton Inc. in return for State Dept. contracts.

    In late 2012, after overseeing Lockheed’s successful relationship with the Hillary State Department and the resulting profits, Comey stepped down from Lockheed and received a $6 million dollar payout for his services.

    In 2013, the largest bank of England, HSBC Holdings, was deep into a scandal. Investigations by federal authorities and law-enforcement had revealed that for years HSBC had been laundering billions of dollars for Mexican Drug Cartels, channeling money for Saudi banks who were financing terror, moving money for Iran in violation of the sanctions, and other major criminal activity. HSBC’s criminality was pervasive and deliberate by the Bank and its officials. HSBC was a huge Clinton Foundation contributor (many millions) throughout the “investigation” and Bill Clinton was being paid large personal fees for speaking at HSBC events (while Hillary was Sec of State). Eric Holder and the Obama Justice Department did what they were paid to do, and let HSBC off of the hook for a paltry 1.2 Billion dollar fine (paid by its stockholders), and not one Director, officer or management member at HSBC was fired or charged with any criminal. Exactly when everyone involved with HSBC Bank (including the Clintons and all of their “donors”) were being let off without penalty, and cover had to be provided to HSBC, Comey was appointed as a Director and Member of the Board of HSBC (in the middle of the fallout from the scandal). He was part of the effort to cover up the scandal and make HSBC “respectable” again.

    After about a year as HSBC director, despite his lack of any law enforcement experience, no DOJ leadership experience, and no qualifications for the job, Comey was appointed FBI director by Obama. The only qualification Comey had was that the Clinton’s and their cronies knew Comey was in bed with them, was compromised and was willing to do their dirty work. Comey was appointed to the FBI right when Hillary was leaving the State Department, and was vulnerable to the FBI because she had been using a private-server, mis-handling classified information, selling access to favors/contracts from the State Department to Clinton Foundation Donors (including Comey’s Lockheed Martin), and much more. Remember that this was about the time the Inspector General of the State Department found over 2 billion “missing” from the State Department finances during Hillary’s tenure.

    The obvious conclusion is that Comey was appointed to the FBI (along with other reliable Clinton-Obama cronies) to run interference for the Clinton’s and Obama’s at the nation’s federal law enforcement agency (in conjunction with a corrupt Department of Justice). Comey was and is owned by the Clintons. He owed all of his power and wealth to being part of their machine and providing them with cover.

    In late 2015 and early 2016, information began to come out about the Clinton Foundation and its use by the Clinton’s as a multi-billion dollar slush fund for corruption and political favors. (even Chelsea’s wedding had been paid for by the “charity) This was right as Hillary was beginning her campaign for President. It was revealed that the Foundation had never completed required reports or had an audit. Supposedly the FBI, under Comey, began an “investigation” of the Clinton Funds. A “professional” accounting firm was brought in by the Clintons to do a review, file some reports, make recommendations to the Clinton Foundation Board, and provide a veneer of legitimacy to the Clinton Fund operations. Predictably, one of the partners in the firm that was chosen (and paid lots of money) is the brother of James Comey (FBI Director). This brother owes James Comey $700,000 for a loan James gave him to buy a house, and presumably some of the money from the Clinton Fund was used to make payments to James on the loan. Over 2 years later and nothing has happened as a result of the FBI “investigating” the Clinton Funds under Comey.

    No one in congress or federal law enforcement was intending to actually pursue the Clintons, but Judicial Watch and other independent sources obtained information proving that Hillary had been running her own server, sending out classified information, etc. This information began to come out right in the middle of her campaign to be coronated as President. A “show” investigation had to be performed to appear to look into it and clear her. Who to use?…the reliable shill James Comey.

    As head of the FBI, Comey (and his lackeys in key positions) deliberately screwed up the investigation into Hillary’s use of a private server and her plain violation of national security law on classified information. The investigation was deliberately mis-handled in every aspect. Comey gave immunity to all of Hillary’s lackeys, did not use subpoenas or warrants, lost evidence, allowed the destruction of evidence, failed to do any searches or seizures of evidence, did not use a grand-jury, did not swear witnesses, did not record testimony, allowed attorneys to represent multiple suspects (corrupting the testimony). Everything that could be done to ruin the FBI investigation and to cover for Hillary was done. A “slam-dunk” case became a mess. Immunity was given every witness even though they provided no help. Maybe more importantly, by focusing the FBI on the email scandal, attention was drawn away from the much bigger scandal of the Clinton Foundation that could bring down a huge number of corrupt politicians, lobbyists, and even governments.

    Originally, Comey’s job was simply to totally botch the Hillary investigation and ruin the case against her and her minions within the FBI regarding he emails. At the same time Comey also started work on a parallel assignment to illegally “wiretap” and surveil Donald Trump and every other person involved in the Republican campaign. He was tasked with digging up any dirt or fact that could be used to hurt the Trump campaign later. This included using a fake “dossier” paid for by the Clinton campaign to obtain authorization for the surveillance and to try to associate Trump’s campaign with the Russians. Under Comey’s direction the Trump/republican campaign was monitored and surveilled and all information was provided to the Obama Whitehouse and the Clinton camp all during the campaign.

    Lorretta Lynch was supposed to complete the coverup for Hillary as Attorney General by issuing a finding that the deliberately botched FBI “investigation” did not justify prosecution of Hillary. But someone screwed up and Bill Clinton was video’d meeting with Loretta Lynch in Arizona shortly before she was supposed to make her decision on Hillary (interference with a federal investigation), and Lynch could no longer credibly squash the Hillary scandal. The solution, give the job to James. The Clinton’s owned him and he would have to do whatever is necessary to provide cover.

    Comey goes on national TV and violates every rule of the FBI, the Justice Department and American law enforcement by revealing some of the FBI’s “evidence” of what Hillary did (enough to make it look like the FBI and Comey did some investigation), then declaring that there was no “intent” and clearing Hillary. He did what he was ordered to do. The Justice Department and Obama backed Comey’s coverup and it looked like Hillary had survived the scandal.

    Then, right before the election, the NYPD obtained pervert Anthony Wiener’s laptop and found classified emails from Hillary on the laptop. The NYPD began leaking details to new-media outlets, and the story was about to explode. Comey once again stepped in to cover Hillary. He short-circuited the NYPD leaks by publicly acknowledging the laptop and the emails, but then claimed just days later that hundreds of thousands of emails had all been reviewed and “nothing new” was on the laptop. Once again, he had done his job. Providing cover and FBI “protection” for Hillary on the newest scandal when it broke.

    If Hillary had won, Comey would have kept right on providing cover for the corruption of the Clinton machine. He would have kept the FBI paralyzed, prevented the Clinton Fund from being investigated, and continued to do his job as the Clinton’s personal scandal eraser at the FBI.


    The Swamp and its bottom-dwelling denizens realize they are at risk from this political outsider who is not connected to the uni-party machines. Before Trump takes office, a “failsafe” plan is implemented to ruin Trump’s administration and try to force him out of the Presidency. The key players committed to the plan are the democrat politicians, the RINO establishment, the media, the Obama-Clinton operatives imbedded throughout the intelligence agencies and the entire bureaucracy, and most importantly, the Obama DOJ and JAMES COMEY. The scheme is to smear Trump with Russian “connections,” through a fake FBI “investigation” and more importantly, to trap him into a charge of criminal interference with the FBI. COMEY IS THE CENTRAL FIGURE IN THE SCHEME TO TAKE DOWN TRUMP.

    The surveillance of the Trump campaign is continued after he is elected, all participants are “unmasked” illegally, and the transcripts are leaked throughout the government and to the media. When General Flynn appropriately calls Russian officials on behalf of Trump, they brush off the old fake “dossier” and all of the surveillance of the campaign, and Comey creates the “Russian Conspiracy” investigation. With help by RINO swamp kingpin and warmonger sell-out McCain, the fake “Russian pee dossier” is leaked to the press. There is no actual evidence of any collusion or connection between Trump or his campaign with Russia, but that does not prevent Comey from initiating an “investigation” at the FBI. This provides Comey with protection from Trump firing him immediately. Comey (or his minions) constantly leak news of the “Russia Investigation” to the media, and the media does its scripted part by screaming constantly about “Russia.” The Democrats fill their role and constantly scream about “Russia.” McCain and the RINO establishment do their part by promising to “investigate” how the Russians influenced the campaign.

    Immediately after Trump is sworn in, the DOJ Hillary/Obama operatives and Comey start the direct attack. This is before Sessions has been appointed to the Department of Justice and the DOJ is still controlled by Obama operatives. DOJ Obama appointee Sally Yates approaches the Whitehouse with news that General Flynn had been in contact with Russia and alleges that he might be compromised. She reveals that there is an FBI “investigation” into the Russia ties (which they are constantly leaking to the media themselves). The White House Counsel (who Yates talks to, not Trump) asks for some more information.

    The day before the promised additional information is to be provided by Yates to the Whitehouse, Comey sets up a dinner with Trump. If he can get Trump to ask about Flynn or try to intervene regarding Flynn or Russia then Trump can be charged with “interfering with an FBI investigation.” MY OPINION IS THAT COMEY SURVEILLED AND “TAPED” THIS MEETING IN HIS ATTEMPT TO SET UP TRUMP.

    This is a two-pronged attack. It protects Comey and DOJ democrat holdovers from being terminated by the new administration because they are involved in an “ongoing investigation” that they control the timetable on (albeit one with absolutely no evidence). If Trump fires Comey then he is “interfering with the investigation” which is itself a federal crime that the FBI could then “investigate.” Alternatively, if they can get Trump to question Comey about Flynn or try to get him to back off of Flynn or the “Russia” investigation, then they again have him “interfering.”

    Trump knows it is a set up by Comey and that he is probably being recorded (tips from FBI or DOJ who are not part of the corruption?) Maybe because his phone calls in the Whitehouse as President have already been bugged and released to the media. (FBI is in the best position to do this) Maybe because he was used to the Mafia in NY trying to shake him down every time he built a hotel. Comey tells Trump that Trump is not under investigation regarding Russia, but that others involved with the campaign are being investigated. Trump does not take the bait and attempt to intervene about Flynn or the Russia scam. Later, Flynn is cut loose because he is being used by Comey and the Obama-holdover Justice to try to damage Trump. He did notthing wrong, but if he stayed the charge of “interfering with an investigation” might seem to have teeth. Comey verbally tells Trump on two more occasions that he is not being investigated, but refuses to state this fact publicly or when testifying in Congress.

    Trump knows everything I have gone through above about Comey. But he has to move carefully. He has to get his Attorney General and Deputy AG in place, get enough leverage on the Russia narrative, and ideally get rid of Comey in a way that allows him to obtain all the information that Comey has been accumulating (if he is taping Trump he is taping others). Comey, and others testify in Congress. Under oath, both Sally Yates and Intelligence officials from the Obama administration state that there has been no actual evidence of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. More importantly, Comey, while refusing to say that Trump is not under investigation, testifies that he has informed the Senate Intelligence Committee heads who exactly is under investigation regarding Russia.

    Trump tells almost no one at the White House that he is moving against Comey (so no leaks… no listening in on his conversations). Trump somehow contacts Sen. Grassley (the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee) and confirms that Comey told the Senator that Trump was not under investigation personally. Trump gets both the Attorney General and the new Deputy Attorney General to legitimately review Comey’s unprofessional actions at the FBI and to recommend in writing that Trump terminate Comey. Somehow Comey goes to California (at the request of AG Sessions or already scheduled and someone at FBI telling Trump?).

    Trump seizes the moment and acts. While Comey is in California, 3000 miles away and 7 hours from his office, Trump prepares a letter firing him (with Sessions and the Deputy AG recommendations attached). In the letter Trump states that he had been told 3 times by Comey that he (Trump) was not under investigation. The letter is hand-delivered to the FBI headquarters by DOJ officials to lock-down and seize everything in Comey’s office, including all surveillance files (“tapes”) of Trump and others. All of Comey’s files, docs, computers and “tapes” are taken to Sessions at DOJ. They are not taken to the Whitehouse or Trump, but to Sessions, who has every right to have them. Sessions can tell Trump that Comey had surveillance tapes of Trump that contradict what Comey has been telling Trump, and perhaps tapes of conversations with other swamp “conspirators.” But Trump does not have them personally or at the Whitehouse.

    Comey learns he has been fired when the media broadcasts it in California. He had no idea it was coming and he is ticked. On cue, the Democrat politicians and media begin screaming about Trump’s “interference with the Russia investigation” in accordance with the plan to set up Trump for that charge. The Swamp wants to blow up the Russia narrative using Comey, and Comey is set to testify before Congress to try to hurt Trump by saying he was interfering with the FBI investigation. Comey intends to follow through with the plan to take down Trump.

    But because of his brilliant timing on this, Trump has Comey’s files, documents and information safely with Sessions at DOJ. Trump sends out a “crazy” tweet that says: “James Comey better hope that there are no “tapes” of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press.”

    The media and the politicians go crazy about the “inappropriateness” of this tweet. They accuse Trump of “taping” everyone at the White House (forgetting that the Presidents phone calls with foreign leaders have been “taped” without his knowledge.)

    Notice that Trump did not say he taped anyone, or that he has any tapes at the White House. It seem apparent that Trump is telling Comey that the DOJ (who has every legal right to possess it) has the surveillance information and files from Comey’s office, the “tapes” obtained and kept by Comey. Comey and all the Swamp Creatures understand the clear message… their plan has failed and Trump’s DOJ is now holding all the cards.

    The whole Russia interference scheme crashes and burns. While the mouthpiece media, Hollywood and the insane fringe continue to scream about Russia and Comey being fired, the politicians who will soon be in the crosshairs of a legitimate (and ticked) FBI and DOJ are starting to fall strangely silent. Comey realizes all the leverage is with Trump and that he will be lucky if he is not added to the Clinton Death List because of his knowledge (better not take any baths near an electrical outlet or get on any airplanes).

    Comey tells Congress he will not testify and writes a public letter to the FBI accepting his firing and telling them he does not want to discuss why or how he was terminated. Senator Grassley and Senator Feinstein (she must be covering her butt in fear …) issue public statements confirming that Comey told them that the “Russia Investigation” does not involve President Trump personally.

    AG Sessions and his Deputy AG use the Comey trove of information to determine who has been part of the Comey Syndicate at the FBI. They will be appointing an “interim” Director of the FBI shortly who has not been compromised by Comey, Clinton or Obama. That “interim” Director does not have to be approved by Congress or anyone, and can immediately begin cleaning house at the FBI of all Comey/Clinton/Obama minions, initiating investigations of the Clintons, Clinton Fund, violations of intelligence confidentiality laws by Susan Rice and Obama, human trafficking in DC, political corruption… draining the Swamp. Using the Comey files they can be fairly certain they are not getting another Comey as an “interim”, and they do not have to wait for the circus of appointing a new permanent “Director” through Congressional approval. Most of the heavy lifting on rooting out FBI corruption and starting investigations into the swamp will be done by the “interim” before a new director is appointed. I suspect the Trump administration hopes the approval FBI Director process will be slow and tedious, so there is no political interference with the housecleaning that is starting.

    In one masterstroke, Trump has eliminated a truly toxic and dangerous enemy to his administration and our country, dealt a horrendous blow to the Clinton/Obama and deep state machines, begun the restoration of the integrity of the FBI and the DOJ, and gained incredible ammunition to begin hunting the foul creatures in the swamp.

    — Lisa Frank

    Happy Hunting President Trump… and God Bless!

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Sun May 21, 2017 6:42 pm

    Where is the special prosecutor for O?

    Official: Obama broke 78 laws as president, here's the list.

    The list is might long, and is a striking record of Obama’s real legacy — the one the media pundits and Democrats will not tell you about:

    1) Illegally armed Mexican drug cartels and ISIS militants

    In Operation Fast and Furious, the Obama administration facilitated the sale of thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels and stopped tracking those weapons once they crossed the border so the administration could later blame the Second Amendment.

    “The Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives apparently ordered one of its own agents to purchase firearms with taxpayer money, and sell them directly to a Mexican drug cartel,” the New York Post reported. “Let that sink in: After months of pretending that ‘Fast and Furious’ was a botched surveillance operation of illegal gun-running spearheaded by the ATF and the US attorney’s office in Phoenix, it turns out that the government itself was selling guns to the bad guys.”

    Even more shocking, President Obama authorized a shipment of guns to the Syrian opposition, a.k.a. ISIS-linked militants, on the exact same day he demanded more gun control in response to the Oregon shooting.

    “…The President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia enters the war-torn country,” CNN reported in October.

    But virtually all of the rebels in Syria have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State since at least 2013.

    “The Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council, the vaunted bulwarks of the moderate opposition, only really exist in hotel lobbies and the minds of Western diplomats,” Journalist Ben Reynolds wrote in November. “There is simply no real separation between ‘moderate’ rebel groups and hardline Salafists allied with al-Qaeda.”

    2) Attempting to shut down gun stores outside of law

    In a classic case of criminal racketeering, the U.S. Department of Justice was pressuring banks to refuse service to gun stores in a program entitled Operation Choke Point.

    Under the program started in 2014 if not before, the DOJ was attempting to shut down legal gun dealers by coercing financial institutions to close the bank and merchant accounts associated with their businesses.

    In 2012, Bank of America told a gun company, McMillan Group International, that because the company was expanding into firearms manufacturing, the bank no longer wanted McMillan’s business.

    “We have to assess the risk of doing business with a firearms-related industry,” the bank’s representative told operations director Kelly McMillan.

    And not long after, BitPay, a U.S.-based bitcoin processor, likewise refused to do business with gun dealer Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gunworks due to a similar policy.

    3) Spent tax dollars to re-settle illegals inside U.S.

    U.S. Customs and Border Patrol has been purchasing bus tickets and vouchers for illegal immigrants in order to ship them deeper into the country at taxpayers’ expense, according to a McAllen, Texas city official.

    “They’re not bringing them here, they’re bringing them to our bus terminals because that’s where the Border Patrol understands that they have transportation to go to the interior,” McAllen, Texas City Attorney Kevin Pagan said in an interview with Infowars. “So they’re dropping them off and it’s our understanding that they were dropped off with tickets or with vouchers for tickets, but it turns out that some of them tonight didn’t have their tickets or their vouchers for tickets, or like I said their buses are tomorrow, so they have no where to stay.”

    Several months earlier, Obama ordered the Border Patrol to stand down from protecting the border and enforcing immigration laws.

    “We are simply being ordered to stand down and stop tracking and trying to apprehend the criminals,” Shawn Moran, Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council, told Breitbart.

    4) Using executive action to restrict Second Amendment

    Obama decided to use his “pen and his phone” to enact gun control without Congressional approval.

    “Without a Democratic majority in Congress, and faced with a GOP that is firmly against any form of gun control measures, Obama has repeatedly warned that he would act on his own,” Zero Hedge reported.

    For one thing, Obama is attempting to require private sellers to conduct background checks.

    “The action, officials explained, would include guidance on how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives will now determine who is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms under federal law and, therefore, who is required to obtain a license to sell firearms,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.

    Obama may also try and prevent people on the no-fly list from being able to purchase guns, which violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process by allowing the government to deprive people of their rights based only on suspicion.

    Additionally, numerous law-abiding Americans have been wrongly placed on the No-Fly list due to false information, clerical errors or political persecution.

    “The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people – including U.S. citizens – as terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence,” the ACLU reported. “The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching; they can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel.”

    5) Illegally targeted conservative groups via IRS

    Obama’s IRS had illegally targeted conservative groups for additional “reviews” of their tax status applications.

    Organizations with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their names were singled out for harassment, such as requiring them to provide information about their family members, their social media posts and a list of donors.

    Obama had met with a key IRS official who was involved in the targeting just two days before the key official told his colleagues how to target conservative groups. The Daily Caller reported:

    The Obama appointee implicated in congressional testimony in the IRS targeting scandal met with President Obama in the White House two days before offering his colleagues a new set of advice on how to scrutinize tea party and conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

    IRS chief counsel William Wilkins, who was named in House Oversight testimony by retiring IRS agent Carter Hull as one of his supervisors in the improper targeting of conservative groups, met with Obama in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on April 23, 2012. Wilkins’ boss, then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman, visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on April 24, 2012, according to White House visitor logs.

    On April 25, 2012, Wilkins’ office sent the exempt organizations determinations unit “additional comments on the draft guidance” for approving or denying tea party tax-exempt applications, according to the IRS inspector general’s report.

    During Obama’s first four years as President, IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman made 157 visits to the White House.

    “This is more visits to the White House – by a very large margin – than any other cabinet member during Obama’s first term,” Journalist Tim Brown revealed. “By comparison, during the four years that Mark Everson was IRS commissioner when Bush was president, Everson made only one visit to the White House.”

    6) Secretly obtained phone records from Associated Press journalists

    In May 2013, Associated Press reported:

    “The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

    The records obtained by the Justice Department listed outgoing calls for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP. It was not clear if the records also included incoming calls or the duration of calls.

    In all, the government seized the records for more than 20 separate telephone lines assigned to AP and its journalists in April and May of 2012. The exact number of journalists who used the phone lines during that period is unknown but more than 100 journalists work in the offices where phone records were targeted, on a wide array of stories about government and other matters.”

    Obtaining these phone records required approval from former Attorney General Eric Holder.

    7) Carried out military interventionism in Libya without Congressional approval

    Obama violated the Constitution when he launched military operations in Libyawithout Congressional approval.

    Cool Expanded Bush’s unconstitutional government faith-based programs

    Obama actually expanded the federal government’s faith based programs which had been started by President George W. Bush.

    9) Supported Bush’s unconstitutional Patriot Act

    Obama renewed the Patriot Act in 2011.

    10) Agrees with Bush’s support of unconstitutional, indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without filing any charges

    Obama signed an unconstitutional bill that gave the U.S. government the power to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens without any charges being filed or any trial taking place.

    11) Supports unconstitutional, warrantless wiretapping

    President Obama is a huge supporter of warrantless wiretapping.

    12) Had four U.S. citizens killed without judicial process

    Obama had four U.S. citizens killed without judicial process, to which then-U.S. Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) said was an impeachable offense.

    13) Ordered private company to fire 1,000 employees

    After Boeing hired 1,000 new employees to work at its new factory in South Carolina in 2011, the Obama administration ordered the company to close it down because the factory was non-union.

    14) Stole money from retired teachers and police officers

    During the Chrysler bankruptcy, Obama violated the Fifth Amendment and more than 150 years of bankruptcy law by illegally treating secured creditors worse than unsecured creditors.

    “Upsetting this fixed hierarchy among creditors is just an illegal taking of property from one group of creditors for the benefit of another, which should be struck down on both statutory and constitutional grounds,” according to Richard A. Epstein, a law professor at New York University School of Law.

    15) Fired Inspector General for discovering that Obama’s friend had embezzled government funds

    Obama fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin in 2009 after Walpin accused Sacramento mayor Kevin Johnson, an Obama supporter, of misusing AmeriCorps funding to pay for political activities.

    Later on, a bipartisan group of 145 current and former public officials and legal scholars signed a letter stating Walpin’s firing was politically motivated.

    16) Lied about letting people keep their health insurance

    Before Obamacare was passed, Obama said:

    “No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people… If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.”

    But once it was passed, the Congressional Budget Office said Obamacare would cause at least seven million people to lose their insurance.

    17) Lied about the cost of Obamacare

    Before Obamacare was passed, Obama promised:

    “I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits – either now or in the future. I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I’m serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don’t materialize.”

    However, not long after Obama signed it, the Washington Post reported it would add over $340 billion to the budget deficit over the next decade.

    18) Gave tax dollars to campaign contributors and lobbyists, and falsely claimed the money was for “green energy”

    In 2009, the Obama administration gave $535 million to green-energy company Solyndra, claiming that it would create 4,000 new jobs, but the company soon went bankrupt.

    It was later revealed the company’s executives had made substantial donations to Obama’s campaign and that Solyndra executives had had many meetings with White House officials.

    19) Had “off the record” meetings with lobbyists

    In June 2010, the New York Times said the Obama administration officials had held hundreds of meetings with lobbyists at coffee houses near the White House to avoid the disclosure requirements for White House visitors.

    20) Had armed SWAT agents raid a law-abiding guitar factory because it was owned by a Republican

    President Obama had an armed SWAT team raid the Gibson guitar factory and seized guitars and other property from the factory – without any charges being filed.

    Obama’s so-called justification for the raid was that Gibson had broken environmental laws from India regarding the imported wood that Gibson had been using, but C.F. Martin & Company, Gibsons’s competitor, had used the exact same imported wood.

    The difference? Henry E. Juszkiewicz, the CEO of Gibson, was a Republicandonor, whereas Chris Martin IV, the CEO of Martin, was a Democraticdonor.

    21) Ignored constitutional requirements for appointees

    Late U.S. Senator Robert Byrd, a Democrat, expressed concerns that Obama’s dozens of czars appointed in 2009 might violate the U.S. Constitution because they were not approved by the U.S. Senate.

    Another Democrat, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, shared a similar sentiment.

    22) Tried to outlaw family farms

    The Obama administration wanted to eradicate family farms in 2012 by trying to prohibit farm children under 18 from working in various farm-related activities.

    23) Auctioned off ambassadorship to the Netherlands

    Obama nominated Timothy Broas to be U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands after Broas donated at least $500,000 to Obama’s 2012 campaign.

    24) Made the TSA even more abusive and ridiculous than it had been under Bush

    Under the Obama administration, the TSA has been giving very invasive pat-downs on young children which would otherwise constitute child molestation.

    25) Illegally demanded monetary payment for Freedom of Information Act request

    The Obama administration demanded the Goldwater Institute pay nearly $79,000before it would share public records via the Freedom of Information Act.

    26) Stole money from retired Delphi employees

    Obama eliminated the pensions of 20,000 retired Delphi employees in 2009.

    27) Used “off the books” funding for military interventionism

    Anti-war activists who helped elect Obama accused him of using the same “off-the-books” funding as his predecessor George W. Bush when the president requested over $83 billion from Congress for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    28) Tried to silence criticism of auto-bailouts

    The Obama administration pressured the Ford Motor Company to stop criticizing Obama’s bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler in a TV ad.

    29) Tried to silence video on YouTube

    Obama actually asked a Jewish singing group to take down its video from the Internet in 2011.

    30) Illegally gave Obamacare exemptions to unions that supported the passage of Obamacare

    Obama gave some of his favorite organizations an exemption from some Obamacare requirements.

    Many of these organizations were unions that had supported the passage of Obamacare, but then afterwards wanted exemptions from the very same law they forced on everyone else.

    The Constitution, however, requires the law to treat everyone as equals.

    The Washington Times said of this:

    “Selective enforcement of the law is the first sign of tyranny. A government empowered to determine arbitrarily who may operate outside the rule of law invariably embraces favoritism as friends, allies and those with the best-funded lobbyists are rewarded. Favoritism inevitably leads to corruption, and corruption invites extortion. Ultimately, the rule of law ceases to exist in any recognizable form, and what is left is tyranny.”

    “The now-familiar monthly trickling down of new waivers is, at best, a tacit admission that Obamacare is a failure. So far, seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists.”

    “More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members account for less than 12 percent of the American work force. The same unions that provided more than $120 million to Democrats in the last two elections and, in many cases, openly campaigned in favor of the government takeover of your health care, now celebrate that Obamacare is not their problem.”

    31) Defended Bush administration’s unconstitutional, unwarranted use of GPS device

    The Obama administration opposed the U.S. Supreme Court for ruling against the Bush administration over the installation of a GPS tracking device on someone’s car without a warrant.

    32) Was cited by nine states for committing 21 illegal acts

    Attorneys General from nine states listed 21 illegal acts which had been committed by the Obama administration.

    33) Tried to seize hotel because some of its customers had used illegal drugs

    The Obama administration tried to shut down a mom-and-pop bed-and-breakfast because some if its guests had used illegal drugs.

    34) Made recess appointments when Congress was not in recess

    Obama violated the Constitution by making four recess appointments when Congress was not in recess in Jan. 2012.

    A federal appeals court later ruled that Obama’s appointments had violated the Constitution.

    35) Supports guns for himself and his wife, but opposes them for everyone else

    President Obama signed a 2013 bill providing armed guards for himself and his wife for the rest of the lives.

    But when Obama was an Illinois state senator in 2004, he voted againstcitizens keeping guns in their own homes to protect themselves and their families.

    36) Approved giving 20 F-16 fighter jets to a Sharia dictatorship

    Obama once gave 20 F-16 fighter jets to Egypt while it was under a Sharia dictatorship.

    37) Violated the very same campaign finance laws that he claims to support

    Obama’s 2012 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for violating campaign finance laws.

    38) Encouraged employers to switch their employees from full time to part time

    The New York Times said Obamacare “sharply penalizes full-time employment in favor of part-time employment.”

    In response to the employer mandate of Obamacare, many businesses and even colleges switched some of their employees from full time to part time.

    Leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE penned a 2013 letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi stating that Obamacare will “destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class… the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees’ work hours below 30 hours a week. Numerous employers have begun to cut workers’ hours to avoid this obligation.”

    39) Had Freedom of Information Act record worse than Bush’s

    when it came to honoring requests under the Freedom of Information Act, Obama’s record was far worse than that of George W. Bush.

    40) Supports installation of hidden cameras on private property without a search warrant

    Obama’s Justice Department once argued in favor of installing hidden cameras on private property without a search warrant.

    41) Accepted illegal campaign contributions from foreign citizens

    During an experiment, a non-U.S. citizen attempted to make two $5 donations to both Obama’s campaign and Mitt Romney’s campaign.

    While the Romney campaign rejected both donations, the Obama website accepted them cheerfully.

    42) Lied about the Benghazi attack

    After four U.S. citizens were killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, in Sept. 2012, the Obama administration falsely claimed the attack was a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim video at YouTube.

    Even more, the Obama administration took an entire week before it acknowledged the attacks as terrorism.

    And although the Obama administration made a dozen revisions to its versions of the incident, then-White House Press Secretary Jay Carneyfalsely claimed that only a “single adjustment” had been made.

    ABC News later published a complete list of all the changes to the White House talking points.

    43) Complained to YouTube about an anti-Muslim video

    The Obama administration actually phoned YouTube in 2012 to complain about an anti-Muslim video.

    “It does make us nervous when the government throws its weight behind any requests for censorship,” Ben Wizner of the ACLU said.

    44) Falsely said that Fast and Furious was started when Bush was President

    Obama lied when he said Fast and Furious had “begun under the previous administration” in 2012.

    Fast and Furious actually began around September 2009, months after Bush left office.

    45) Illegally refused to fire Kathleen Sebelius after she violated campaign finance laws

    Kathleen Sebelius, Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, was caught violating campaign finance laws in 2012, but despite federal law requiring Obama to fire her over the illegal activity, he refused to do so.

    46) Gave special access to people who raised or donated $500,000

    People who raised or donated at least $500,000 to Organizing for Action, a pro-Obama political group, would be given “the privilege of attending quarterly meetings with the president, along with other meetings at the White House.”

    47) Adopted harmful new restrictions on prescription painkillers – even though the House had already voted against them

    The Obama administration ignored the House’s rejection of new restrictions on prescription painkillers by adopting them anyway.

    48) Illegally refused to submit a budget on time during four of his first five years

    Despite being legally required to submit a budget by the first Monday in February, Obama broke this law at least four times.

    In contrast, since 1921, no President had missed this deadline more than once.

    49) Fined UPS $40 million because some of its customers had used UPS to ship illegal drugs

    Obama forced UPS to pay $40 million in 2013 because some of its customers had used the company to ship illegal drugs.

    50) Added 20,000 extra pages to Obamacare without Congressional approval

    After Obamacare was passed, Obama added 20,000 extra pages to it even though those extra pages were not voted on by Congress.

    51) Waited until after the 2012 election to release unpopular Obamacare rules

    The New York Times reported in 2013:

    … even fervent supporters of the law admit that things are going worse than expected.

    … the Obama administration didn’t want to release unpopular rules before the election.

    Everything is turning out to be more complicated than originally envisioned.

    A law that was very confusing has become mind-boggling… Americans are just going to be overwhelmed and befuddled. Many are just going to stay away, even if they are eligible for benefits.

    52) Tried to rig federal auctions of radio spectrum space

    The Obama administration was trying to rig federal auctions of radio spectrum spacein a manner that would favor Sprint and T-Mobile over its competitors.

    53) Put someone in jail for making an anti-Muslim video

    Politico reported in 2013:

    “Nakoula Basseley Nakoula deserves a place in American history. He is the first person in this country jailed for violating Islamic anti-blasphemy laws.”

    “You won’t find that anywhere in the charges against him, of course. As a practical matter, though, everyone knows that Nakoula wouldn’t be in jail today if he hadn’t produced a video crudely lampooning the prophet Muhammad.”

    “In the weeks after the attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, the Obama administration claimed the terrorist assault had been the outgrowth of a demonstration against the Nakoula video. The administration ran public service announcements in Pakistan featuring President Barack Obama saying the U.S. had nothing to do with it. In a speech at the United Nations around this time, the president declared – no doubt with Nakoula in mind – ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.’”

    54) Rewarded one of his biggest campaign fundraisers by nominating him for the ambassadorship to Canada

    Obama nominated Bruce Heyman to be the ambassador to Canada in 2013after Heyman raised more than $1 million for Obama.

    55) Asked contractors to disclose their political donations before bidding on government contracts

    Obama asked contractors to disclose their political donations before bidding on federal contracts in 2011.

    56) Falsely accused a law abiding news reporter of being “an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation

    The Obama administration falsely labeled Fox contributor James Rosen as “an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation when it applied for a warrant to read his emails.

    The New York Times reported:

    With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation of a news leak, the Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news.

    Leak investigations usually focus on the source, not the reporter. But, in this case, federal prosecutors also asked a federal judge for permission to examine Mr. Rosen’s personal e-mails, arguing that “there is probable cause to believe” Mr. Rosen is “an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator” in the leak.

    Though Mr. Rosen was not charged, the F.B.I. request for his e-mail account was granted secretly in late May 2010. The government was allowed to rummage through Mr. Rosen’s e-mails for at least 30 days.

    The Washington Post also said:

    “The Rosen affair is as flagrant an assault on civil liberties as anything done by George W. Bush’s administration, and it uses technology to silence critics in a way Richard Nixon could only have dreamed of.

    To treat a reporter as a criminal for doing his job – seeking out information the government doesn’t want made public – deprives Americans of the First Amendment freedom on which all other constitutional rights are based. Guns? Privacy? Due process? Equal protection? If you can’t speak out, you can’t defend those rights, either.

    Beyond that, the administration’s actions shatter the president’s credibility and discourage allies who would otherwise defend the administration against bogus accusations such as those involving the Benghazi “talking points.” If the administration is spying on reporters and accusing them of criminality just for asking questions – well, who knows what else this crowd is capable of doing?”

    57) Asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate himself for lying under oath

    U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder lied under oath when he said he had nothing to do with monitoring the emails of Fox reporter James Rosen, even though his own signature on the search warrant.

    In response, Obama asked Holder to investigate himself!

    58) Used Obamacare to illegally give the IRS additional powers without approval from Congress

    The Washington Post reported in 2013:

    [Obamacare] allows the Department of Health and Human Services to set up federal health exchanges in the holdout states. But the statute makes no mention of the IRS providing credits and subsidies through federal exchanges.

    The IRS resolved this conundrum by denying its existence. In a May 2012 regulatory ruling, it asserted its own right to provide credits outside the state exchanges as the reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law. But the language of the law is not ambiguous. And health scholars Jonathan Adler and Michael Cannon, in an exhaustive recent analysis, find no justification for the IRS’s ruling in the legislative history of Obamacare….

    So: The IRS seized the authority to spend about $800 billion over 10 years on benefits that were not authorized by Congress.

    59) Illegally solicited donations from health insurers

    In May 2013, Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius illegally solicited donations from health insurers to help pay for Obamacare.

    60) Proposed military interventionism in Syria

    Obama proposed the U.S. oust the Syrian government in 2013 by military action.

    61) Refused to fire or prosecute more than 1,000 IRS employees who illegally used their IRS credit cards for their own personal use

    Obama refused to fire or prosecute more than 1,000 IRS employees illegally used their IRS credit cards for personal purchases.

    62) Had the Secret Service visit a law abiding citizen who had criticized his policies on Twitter

    Obama ordered the Secret Service to visit the home of Tom Francois, a law abiding citizen who had criticized Obama’s policies on Twitter in 2013.

    The Secret Service later admitted that Francois had not made any threats against the president.

    63) Had the IRS grant special, illegal favors for his brother’s so-called “charity”

    The Daily Caller reported the IRS had taken the “unprecedented” step of approving a non-profit application within just one month from the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a so-called “charity” which was headed by Malik Obama, Barack Obama’s brother.

    Additionally, the IRS illegally gave retroactive approval for the organization’s tax exempt status and had illegally solicited tax deductible donations even though it did not have legal approval to do so.

    64) Illegally bypassed Congress to delay Obamacare’s employer mandate

    In July 2013, Obama delayed the employer mandate part of Obamacare until January 2015, even though Congress set it to begin a year prior.

    Obama effectively rewrote a law without approval from Congress, which is highly illegal.

    65) Illegally forced 2,200 privately owned auto dealerships to close, which destroyed 120,000 jobs

    Obama cost 120,000 people their jobs by illegally forced 2,200 privately owned auto dealerships to close in 2009.

    66) Gave 23,994 tax refunds worth a total of $46,378,040 to illegal aliens who all used the same address

    The IRS gave nearly 24,000 tax refunds worth a total of nearly $47 million to illegal aliens in 2011 using the same address in Atlanta, Ga.

    67) Used tax money to pay federal employees to organize protests against George Zimmerman

    Obama actually used tax money to pay federal employees to organizeprotests against George Zimmerman in 2012.

    68) Illegally continued giving foreign aid to Egypt after it had a coup

    The Obama administration said it would illegally continue giving foreign aid to Egypt after its coup.

    69) Broke promise to end Bush’s surveillance of U.S. citizens who were not suspected of committing a crime

    Obama lied when he said he would end Bush’s illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens not suspected of committing a crime.

    70) Falsely guaranteed that people could keep their doctor

    Before Obamacare was passed, Obama said:

    “Here is a guarantee that I’ve made… If you’ve got a doctor that you like, you will be able to keep your doctor.”

    This was a complete lie.

    71) Illegally seized a privately owned gun from a law abiding citizen

    After a jury found George Zimmerman not guilty, the Obama administrationannounced it would seize his gun anyway, a violation of both the double jeopardy clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Fifth Amendment.

    72) Illegally prevented individual employees of small businesses from choosing their own plan during the first year of Obamacare

    Obamacare requires that individual employees of small businesses be allowed to choose their own insurance plan during the first year of Obamacare, but the Obama administration kept them from doing so.

    73) Illegally avoided enforcing the required income verification of people who receive subsidies for Obamacare exchanges

    The Obama administration refuses to verify the income of people whoreceive subsidies for Obamacare exchanges.

    74) Illegally delayed the caps on out of pocket health care payments without Congressional approval

    Obama once again illegally rewrote Obamacare by delaying payment caps for one year.

    75) Falsely said the NSA review was being conducted by an “independent” body</strong

    Obama assigned National Intelligence Director James Clapper, who had falsely testified to Congress that the NSA was not collecting information on U.S. citizens, to establish an “independent” investigation of NSA surveillance.

    The list doesn’t need to end at 75:

    76) Nominated a telecommunications lobbyist and Obama fundraiser to head the FCC

    Obama nominated former cable TV lobbyist and Obama fundraiser Tom Wheeler to head the FCC in 2013. Wheeler had previously been the head of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, which is a lobbying organization for the cable TV industry.

    77) Tried to violate defendants’ right to a fair trial

    In August 2013, Reuters reported:

    “A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.

    Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin – not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.

    The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to “recreate” the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don’t know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence – information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.”

    78) Threatened internet service providers with contempt of court if they did not install surveillance software

    The Obama administration had pressured internet service providers to install surveillance software in 2013 so that it could monitor internet traffic without a warrant, a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment.

    The ISPs who refused were later threatened by the administration with contempt of court.

    We’d like to give Claire Bernish of a special thanks for compiling this list of Obama’s criminal actions, which have now been recorded for all future generations see.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Mon May 22, 2017 12:19 am
    No Memos, No Evidence
    Published on May 21, 2017
    Bombshell proof the Comey memo was just another lie sold to the public...

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am

    DONNA BRAZILE WARNED OFF PRIVATE EYE ON SETH RICH MURDER Ex-DNC chairwoman reportedly asked cops why investigator is 'snooping' into case.

    Former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile is the high-ranking DNC representative who allegedly called police and the family of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich and demanded to know why a private investigator was “snooping” into Rich’s death, the private eye revealed to WND Monday.

    “The high-ranking DNC official that called the police after I inquired about Rich’s case was Donna Brazile,” veteran homicide detective Rod Wheeler told WND. “Why shouldn’t I reveal who it was?”

    Wheeler said in several interviews last week that a federal investigator has elaborate details about Rich’s connection to WikiLeaks and is a credible source.

    “I don’t like to suggest things without saying the person’s name, but I can’t say that person’s name, because that person would be thrown under the bus,” Wheeler told Fox News’ Sean Hannity. “This person, we checked him out, we have to check him out, he’s very credible – he said he laid eyes on the computer and he laid eyes on the case file.

    “When you look at that with the totality of everything else that I’ve found on this case, it’s very consistent for a person with my experience to begin to think, perhaps there were some email communications between Seth and WikiLeaks.

    DNC Affiliates Increase Involvement In Seth Rich Case After Wheeler Claims
    A report incited a storm of controversy after former D.C. police homicide detective Rod Wheeler stated that there was tangible evidence on murdered Democratic National Committee (DNC) staffer Seth Rich’s laptop suggesting that he was communicating with Wikileaks prior to his death. The story generated a large amount of outrage, with outlets like the Washington Post and Vice labeling it a “conspiracy theory” and claiming that it had no basis in fact. But details regarding the political affiliation of spokespeople and representatives of the Rich family appear to indicate that the DNC may be prioritizing its own interests, minimizing alleged political elements to the tragedy.

    I. Legal Representatives And Spokespeople For Rich Family Have Ties To DNC, Crime Connected Unions

    Since Fox 5 DC’s report, a number of individuals speaking on behalf of the Rich family have blasted Fox News and Rod Wheeler for speaking out on the case. Rich family spokesman Brad Bauman insisted that anyone who continued to push the story either had a “transparent political agenda,” or were a sociopath. But an August 2016 tweet from Wikileaks revealed that Bauman is a crisis public relations consultant working with the Pastorum Group. A media release from the Pastorum Group reveals that Bauman previously worked for the DNC and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

    The SEIU has previously been reported by the Wall Street Journal as a “top spender” for the Democrats, openly endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016 andactively assisted in her campaign. It has been widely criticized by some groups for the involvement of union members in crimes including embezzlement, criminal conspiracy, perjury and identity theft. The SEIU is also a client of the Strategic Consulting Group, which was founded by the Democratic operative Robert Creamer. In 2016, Creamer was implicated in footage obtained by journalist James O’Keefe which revealed that Creamer was engaging in voting fraud and violent disruption of political events, sometimes using his connections to unions who were as clients of his.

    Bauman’s past professional ties to the DNC and the SEIU raise questions about the vehemence with which he has attacked journalists reporting on the circumstances of Seth Rich’s murder.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Tue May 23, 2017 12:23 pm
    DC Police Seth Rich / PizzaGate Heather Podesta & Rothschild Alefantis Connection

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 10:27 am


    5.23 - 5/22 Manchester False Flag as Seth Rich Story Explodes & BIG Project Updates

    Here is what happened in Manchester so check this out.

    Crisis Actors Rehearse Terror Attack in Manchester, UK

    watch this to the end lol

    Manchester arena incident/hoax...

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 10:34 am

    Muslim Brotherhood in the Whitehouse

    Special Prosecutor MUELLER PURGED FBI Training Docs After 9/11, Compromised FBI.  
    Mueller Purged any Reference To Islamic Terrorists due to Islamist Infiltration and CAIR

    Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom spoke to Maria Bartiromo earlier this month, prior to Robert Mueller being named as special prosecutor and chief phantom Russian chaser in the leftist attempt  to destroy the Trump Presidency. The topic of the interview shifted to the issue of the real collusion, that of the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR taking a prominent role and infiltrating the FBI. He describes how the White House, under both George W. Bush and the Obama regime and the FBI, including specifically Robert Muller, changed to accommodate the demands of the terrorist front organization after the Twin Towers came down.

    Kallstrom says, “You know, right after 9/11, in my view, Bob Mueller, who was then the director, sort of acquiesced with CAIR, which is actually a front group, in my view, of the Muslim Brotherhood. And there was a lot of connections to the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House, without getting into detail.”

    He says, “And the FBI really took away from the training materials of the FBI the whole history of radical fundamentalism. I mean it would kind of be like, okay, we’re not going to know anything about La Cosa Nostra. We’re not going to know anything about their habits or why they do things. I mean it’s just nonsense.” He asks, “How can agents investigate radical fundamentalists without knowing the whole history, where they’re coming from, what their mindset is?”

    Mueller Purged any Reference To Islamic Terrorists due to Islamist Infiltration and CAIR

    Kallstrom summed up their objectives, saying, “You know, that they want to basically infiltrate the United States and take the country over, along with killing people.” Bartiromo clarified, “Mueller took away the tools to do that.” “He took away the tools and he kept them away,” said Kallstrom. Bartiromo continued his thought, saying, “And Comey kept that up.”

    Kallstrom confirmed, “And Comey kept that up and the agents’ training were basically, not the agents were dumb, the materials were dumb. You know and basically this blanket of political correctness, tied behind the back at least one arm of the FBI. Made it really impossible for the FBI to better protect the United States of America, without question.”

    He said, “You know you look back to the Boston and all those other cases, right? It turns out that the FBI knew about those people, right? But they kind of dropped them off the side. Well yeah, in the FBI there was a culture of ‘you’d better not get too out there, you’d better not lean forward too much on some of these people.”

    Bartiromo asks, “Why, I don’t understand, why?” Kallstrom doesn’t have a good answer for that question, saying, “It would take all the psychiatrists in the world to figure it out.” He notes, “And how the political elite went along with this is just really disgusting. You know, it’s a conspiracy of numbness and stupidity that has really harmed the ability of the FBI to protect the United States of America.”

    That’s the sellout who served Islamic appeasers, if not Islamic terrorists and terrorist enablers, who is in control of the future of the man we elected, who has vowed to protect us from these same threats. This coup has many facets and there is no doubt this nation and our President are in serious jeopardy.

    Mueller was made FBI director one week before 9/11 and then immediately after the towers fell started a program of appeasement to the terrorist front group CAIR. Yet somehow he’s hailed by all of these establishment political streetwalkers as some great man of integrity? Integrity isn’t any of their strong suits. There’s a lot that isn’t right with this picture.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 10:37 am
    FBI Director Says FBI a Total Joke and Fraud!
    Published on May 14, 2017
    Former FBI assistant director, James Kallstrom, total destroys James Comey and the rest of the FBI in this shocking interview. Kallston talks about how James Comey intentionally allowed the terrorist organization Muslim brotherhood to infiltrate the white house the rest of the US government!

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 11:27 am

    Rudd vents frustration over US spies leaking 'operational' details about Manchester attack saying she has warned them it ‘cannot happen again.

    The Home Secretary delivered a rare public rebuke to the American authorities by admitting she was 'irritated' by the way 'operational'...

    But the identity of the Manchester bomber, 22-year-old Salman Abedi, was revealed in the American media yesterday with reports attributing the details to 'US officials'. Although British journalists had the name, the UK government and police were refusing to confirm it as the counter-terror operation was still in progress.

    In a highly unusual public criticism today, Ms Rudd said it was 'likely' the bomber was not working alone and the British authorities had wanted to keep the 'element of surprise'.

    'The British police have been very clear that they want to control the flow of information in order to protect operational integrity, the element of surprise,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

    'So it is irritating if it gets released from other sources.

    'I have been very clear with our friends that it should not happen again.'  

    Asked if the leaks had compromised any aspects of the operation, Ms Rudd said: 'I would not go that far, but I can say that they are perfectly clear about the situation and that it cannot happen again.' In a fresh breach of protocol this morning, France's interior minister revealed that Abedi had been in Syria. Mr Collomb said: 'We only know what the British investigators have told us.

    'He was a British national of Libyan origin, he grew up in Great Britain.

    'All of a sudden he travelled to Libya and then most likely to Syria, became radicalised and decided to commit this attack.'
    Asked whether there was a terrorist network, Mr Colomb replied: 'We don't know yet (if there's a network). In any case, links with Daesh (Islamic State) are proven.'

    US officials later told NBC that members of Abedi's own family had previously tipped UK authorities off that he was dangerous.

    Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage said: 'We've learned more about Salman Abedi from American and French security services than the UK Government.'

    Theresa May announced last night that troops are to be deployed onto Britain's streets amid fears a further terror attack 'may be imminent'.

    The PM revealed the move less than 24 hours after the bomb attack at a teen concert at the Manchester Arena, which left 22 dead and 59 injured.

    The Prime Minister confirmed Abedi, a Mancunian of Libyan descent, had carried out the attack.
    But intelligence agencies fear he may not have acted alone - leaving open the possibility of an active Islamist terror cell on the loose. Britain's Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre has raised the terror threat level to 'critical', its highest level.

    Theresa May and Ms Rudd went to Manchester yesterday where they were briefed by police chief Ian Hopkins and the PM visited injured victims in hospital

    The threat level has only been raised to 'critical' twice since the system was introduced on August 1, 2006. Ms Rudd said today that Abedi, who is reported to have recently returned to the UK from a visit to Libya, was known to the intelligence services 'up to a point'.

    She told Sky News: 'We do know that he was known up to a point to the intelligence services'.

    Ms Rudd refused to be drawn about the nature of the information held by the intelligence services about Abedi.
    'I am sure that we will get more information about him over the next few days and the next few weeks,' she said.
    She said the threat level would remain at a heightened state while the investigation into the attack continued.
    'It is an ongoing operation which means that the investigation is continuing to find leads,' she said.

    'So until we can be reassured that there is no continued activity around this operation, that is entirely safe around this operation, then it is right that we are at this heightened state of alert.

    'It is operationally driven, it is intelligence-driven and we must make sure that we allow our counter-terrorist police, our police and our intelligence services to get on and do their job and this helps give them the space to do just that.'

    Read more:

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 1:25 pm

    Just found a wikileaks email of a fundraiser hosted by John & Tony Podesta and the wife of the doctor who over saw Seth Rich at the hospital!

    Googled the wife's name and saw she was in the Podesta Wikileaks emails. Then opened the attachment in the wikileaks email and saw she co-hosted the event with the podesta brothers. This relates to other articles that allege that Seth Rich was alive but died at the hospital due to deliberate neglect. Ironically, I heard one doc say Seth Rich did not have life threatening injuries so one wonders what did he die from?

    Podesta talked about making an "example" of the leaker.

    Here is a wikileaks email talking about a fundraiser for Katie McGinty. [link to ]

    The attachment to the email indicated the fundraiser is hosted by John Podesta, Tony Podesta, and Lisa Kountoupes. Lisa Kountoupes website says she is a "Clinton Administration Veteran". [link to]

    She was named top lobbyist of 2016. link:

    Lisa Kountoupes is the wife of Dr. Jack Sava, who was assigned to over watch Seth Rich at the hospital where he died.

    What a coincidence, that John Podesta, a man furious over leaks he was included in, says he is all in to make an example of the leaker....and Podesta's friend's husband just happens to be the doctor over watching the man who may very well be the leaker Podesta was wanting to make an example of. Some coincidence huh?

    Here is the transcript of the flyer:

    Please Join Co-Hosts Lisa Kountoupes ♦ Andrea LaRue John Podesta ♦ Tony Podesta Vin Roberti

    for a breakfast in support of Katie McGinty

    DEMOCRAT FOR UNITED STATES SENATE Monday, February 22, 2016 8:30 A.M.

    Address available upon RSVP Suggested Contribution:

    Supporter: $2,700 Friend: $1,000 Guest: $500

    RSVP to Dan O’Halloran at (202) 682-2202, email, or online at [link to (page removed]


    Mrs Sava;

    • ENGINEERING. Kountoupes Consulting has been hired by Uranium One Inc. to lobby on “issues related to uranium mining and the uranium market.” Uranium One is more than half-owned by Atomredmetzoloto of Moscow. Lisa Kountoupes, former policy adviser to the chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Shawn Whitman, a former chief of staff to Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), are working on the account. H/T thehill.c@m
    Day 212.2 Hillary's Leakers and Hackers
    Published on May 23, 2017
    Heather Podesta Connected To Seth Rich Doctor?

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 2:19 pm

    Listen to the last 30 seconds of the exchange. As we said at the start - something stinks here!! But do not expect the mainstream media to report on it. One can't help but wonder if anything related to Seth Rich is lurking on that laptop?

    Caught On Tape: Wasserman Schultz Threatens Police Chief For Investigating Her IT Staff's Crimes

    Something stinks here.

    February we first reported on the Anwan brothers, the (Not-Russian) IT Staff Who Allegedly Hacked Congress' Computer Systems.

    Imran Awan seen below with Bill Clinton

    The brothers were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives Thursday, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned.

    Three members of the intelligence panel and five members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the suspects on a shared basis. The two committees deal with many of the nation’s most sensitive issues, information and documents, including those related to the war on terrorism.

    The brothers are suspected of serious violations, including accessing members’ computer networks without their knowledge and stealing equipment from Congress.

    The three men are “shared employees,” meaning they are hired by multiple offices, which split their salaries and use them as needed for IT services.

    Then in March, we noted that House Democrats decided to delay the firing (until today) because their Muslim background, some with ties to Pakistan, could make them easy targets for false charges.

    “I wanted to be sure individuals are not being singled out because of their nationalities or their religion. We want to make sure everybody is entitled to due process,” Meeks said.

    “They had provided great service for me. And there were certain times in which they had permission by me, if it was Hina or someone else, to access some of my data.”

    Fudge told Politico on Tuesday she would employ Imran Awan until he received “due process.”

    “He needs to have a hearing. Due process is very simple. You don’t fire someone until you talk to them,” Fudge said.

    On Wednesday, Lauren Williams, a spokeswoman for Fudge, wouldn’t provide details about Imran Awan’s firing but did confirm he was still employed in Fudge’s office as of Tuesday afternoon.

    The bottom line is simple - these House Democrats decided it was better to be at risk of hacking and extortion than to be accused of racism.

    Then yesterday we reported that Congressional Aides Fear Suspects In IT Breach Are Blackmailing Members With Their Own Data...

    The baffled aides wonder if the suspects are blackmailing representatives based on the contents of their emails and files, to which they had full access.

    “I don’t know what they have, but they have something on someone. It’s been months at this point” with no arrests, said Pat Sowers, who has managed IT for several House offices for 12 years. “Something is rotten in Denmark.”

    A manager at a tech-services company that works with Democratic House offices said he approached congressional offices, offering their services at one-fourth the price of Awan and his Pakistani brothers, but the members declined. At the time, he couldn’t understand why his offers were rejected but now he suspects the Awans exerted some type of leverage over members.

    “There’s no question about it: If I was accused of a tenth of what these guys are accused of, they’d take me out in handcuffs that same day, and I’d never work again,” he said.

    And today, The Daily Caller's Luke Rosiak reports Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.

    The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.

    The Capitol Police and outside agencies are pursuing Imran Awan, who has run technology for the Florida lawmaker since 2005 and was banned from the House network in February on suspicion of data breaches and theft.

    “My understanding is the the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate Members’ equipment when the Member is not under investigation,” Wasserman Schultz said in the annual police budget hearing of the House Committee On Appropriations’ Legislative Branch Subcommittee.

    “We can’t return the equipment,” Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa told the Florida Democrat.

    “I think you’re violating the rules when you conduct your business that way and you should expect that there will be consequences,” Wasserman Schultz said.

    As one of eight members of the Committee on Appropriations’ Legislative Branch subcommittee, Wasserman Schultz is in charge of the budget of the police force that is investigating her staffer and how he managed to extract so much money and information from members.

    In a highly unusual exchange, the Florida lawmaker uses a hearing on the Capitol Police’s annual budget to spend three minutes repeatedly trying to extract a promise from the chief that he will return a piece of evidence being used to build an active case.

    “If a Member loses equipment and it is found by your staff and identified as that member’s equipment and the member is not associated with any case, it is supposed to be returned. Yes or no?” she said.

    Police tell her it is important to “an ongoing investigation,” but presses for its return anyway.

    The investigation is examining members’ data leaving the network and how Awan managed to get Members to place three relatives and a friend into largely no-show positions on their payrolls, billing $4 million since 2010.

    The congresswoman characterizes the evidence as “belonging” to her and argues that therefore it cannot be seized unless Capitol Police tell her that she personally, as opposed to her staffer, is a target of the investigation.

    When TheDCNF asked Wasserman Schultz Monday if it could inquire about her strong desire for the laptop, she said “No, you may not.” After TheDCNF asked why she wouldn’t want the Capitol Police to have any evidence they may need to find and punish any hackers of government information, she abruptly turned around in the middle of a stairwell and retreated back to the office from which she had come.

    Her spokesman, David Dameron, then emerged to say “We just don’t have any comment.”

    Though on the surface Wasserman Schultz would have been a victim of Awan’s scam, she has inexplicably protected him, circumventing the network ban by re-titling him as an “adviser” instead of technology administrator.

    Politico described him and his wife, Hina Alvi, as having a “friendly personal relationship” with both Wasserman Schultz and Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York.

    That baffled a Democratic IT staffer, who said

    “I can’t imagine why she’d be that good of friends with a technology provider.”

    “Usually if someone does bad stuff, an office is going to distance themselves” rather than incur political fallout for a mere staffer.Wasserman Schultz resigned as Chairman of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 after Wikileaks published thousands of internal emails obtained by an as-yet unidentified hacker.

    The last 30 seconds of the exchange can also be seen at video above.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 2:30 pm

    The Awan Brothers - Compromised at least 80 congregational computers and got paid 5 million to do it. We may never know the extent of the breach.

    Plot thickens in probe of House IT contractors
    The Awan Brothers

    3 Awan brothers are named by Webb : Imran, Jamal and Abid. (A 4th brother and wife of one of the Awan's are also believed to be involved). Originally installed in congressional positions by Greg Meeks who is widely regarded as the most corrupt member of congress.

    I will preface this discussion by stating you will find some variation in the numbers cited. I believe that is because I quoted from stories as the case was developing. The Daily Caller was the primary source for most of the news on the net. I tried to be as accurate as possible with the facts quoting the sources I found. I am posting this because I want answers, it is not a definitive work. I do, however, believe the breach is every bit as consequential as the hillary email server and the CIA Wikileak.

    Why isn’t the MSM interested in the Awan Brothers: the three IT specialists fired for rooting through House Democrats’ sensitive files?

    Who are the Awan IT Staff that hacked House Intelligence Computers? And Why Won’t the Media cover this Evidence-based Story?

    I know a bunch of shills will tear me up screaming, "ya got no proof," but indulge me in a conspiracy theory. I think the greatest disservice the MSM had managed to perpetuate is the fallacy that other than the obvious connection of all these people there is otherwise no connection between these events.

    Let's assume for the moment that the items described here are patterns of political belief and criminal activity. They aren't individual acts, but on going criminal conspiracies. Let's not look at this as an isolated event. While I'm detailing the actions of the Awan brothers. I believe, but can not prove, those action may have been perpetuated in concert with other individuals at work in the under belly of the government. It's almost as if disparate groups come in contact occasionally when their objectives overlap. As I stated, I have no proof of this, but it stands to reason the flood of cyber attacks and leaks may have overlapped through the individuals linked in the different events. For example, Debbie Wasserman Schultz was an integral player in the DNC Hacks and also introduced the Awan brothers to Congress. Is there a connection? Maybe, maybe not. It is not that far fetched, this has happened before, see the Silverman group. Silverman associated with the CPUSA and knew Jarrett’s father, Dr. James Bowman and through three degrees of separation used by the NSA is directly connected to Valerie Jerrett. If it is good enough for the IC to open an inquiry why can't we indulge in some similar speculation.

    • The First anomalous fact is the Media. Why have they largely ignored the issue. Before you cyber trolls jump on me, I would like you to consider two facts. Congress deals with very sensitive and classified material all the time. The Awan brothers could never have had a secret clearance for any other group than Congress. There is no news story there?

    • The Second error is the "smoking gun." The evidence is always covered up with a coincidence, a cover story if you will. While I believe the politicos in D.C. are pampered rubes, they do have a good support staff, and some have been trained to support clandestine operations. The rest have been hammered with political optics for the entirety of their career in D.C.. They are all trained to control optics and the dissemination of the truth.

    • The Third fallacy is the "bad guy." Why does everyone think an on going criminal conspiracy can be distilled down to a single criminal committing a crime rather than a pattern of criminal behavior with one or more groups profiting off the criminal activities. It is best to think of their actions like organized crime and should be prosecuted like a RICO case. An on going criminal enterprise by an organized group or groups of conspirators.
    The Media

    Why hasn't the media made this the top news story to at least go along with the Russian hack. Let's face it, the media doesn't care about the damage to the country, they only care about their partisan agenda. If they didn't they would cover stories damaging to the DNC.

    With a $600,000,000 CIA contract you would think the Washington Post could afford an investigative journalist or two. Perhaps CNN will take up an interest as this rabbit hole runs deep and wide. Don't hold your breath.

    Snowflakes and "journalists" can call Trump a fascist, but there is nothing connecting an enormous breach of the United States Security Apparatus by as many as 80 Democrat members of Congress (past and present). We rail on about the Russians and Trump without specific allegations backed up with evidence, but the media avoids providing nightly updates about these 5 spies that have compromised congress. The answer is simple, the Awan Brothers are Muslim and the "victims"/dupes are Dems. Dupes who in fact abused their position of responsibility to end up being compromised by their own "trusted" staff. Several of the Congressmen involved in the breach have gone so far as to blame the allegations on Islamophobia.

    Meeks said he was hesitant to believe the accusations against Alvi, Imran Awan and the three other staffers, saying their background as Muslim Americans, some with ties to Pakistan, could make them easy targets for false charges.
    This story damages the narrative that Muslims are benevolent members of the government and Dems care about the country. It really shows the depth of the progressive aims to "fundamentally transforming the United States of America.
    This is where the conspiracy theory comes in. Give me a little latitude to connect the dots, and let's see where this trail goes...

    An Alleged Muslim Spy Ring - Is This Why Rex Tillerson Cleaned House?

    The mainstream media seemed far more interested in obfuscating the details regarding the Tillerson terminations than they were in covering what could be one of the most dangerous intelligence leaks in years, of which there has been but a peep out of any major news outlet. Captain Joseph R. John (Navy-Ret.) has stated that he believes the Muslim Brotherhood “fifth column” has “infiltrated U.S. Government,” and if he is correct, the Awan brothers could very well be a part of this infiltration.

    The media is 90% Democrat and I would argue that in recent years the mainline Dems have gone hard left, almost Marxist. They have an almost suicidal pact with Islamists. Where does this scandal connect with Middle Eastern Islamists?
    One might well look at the set of circumstances laid out above and see in it a scandal that would make Watergate look like a petty break-in. One might then scratch his or her head and wonder — why on earth would the New York Times or the Washington Post, which incidentally just hired John Podesta (speaking of horrendous cybersecurity!) as a columnist, have virtually no interest in the Awans at all?

    Do Carlos Slim and Jeff Bezos, one might ask, really believe they can’t sell papers with such a story to tell?

    The Smoking Gun

    EXCLUSIVE: House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs Committee Members Compromised By Rogue IT Staff
    Fox News is told the employees made “unauthorized access” to the House computer system.

    Further, there were instances where House information was discovered in an external “cloud” server. The contractors in question reportedly were sending and storing House-related information in that off-site server.

    “That violates House rules and it puts the House at risk,” a source familiar with the investigation said.

    It is unclear whether the access issues exposed the House’s networks to potential hackers or spying efforts by unfriendly nations or terrorist groups, at a time when Washington is on high alert for such cyber-activity.

    Actually the last statement has been refuted. It has been alleged that Imran Awan had achieved a privilege escalation through Social Engineering. Essentially Imran through the political clout of the Congressional leaders he worked for managed to convinced the Capitol Hill IT staff to escalate the Awans to super user privileges to work on the "Congressional Machines" in violation of accepted practices on the network. One device in particular was the Wasserman iPad compromised in the DNC Leak. It has been also alleged they may have had Podesta's password. Since the Dems approved the privilege escalation it is now forensically difficult to determine if the Russians leaked the emails or the "enormously trustworthy and drunken" Awan brothers sold access to the DNC servers.

    House Hacking Suspects Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received

    Imran Awan bullied central IT to bend the rules for him so there wouldn’t be a paper trail about the unusually high permissions he was requesting. And their actions were not logged, so members have no way of knowing what information they may have taken, the central IT employee said.

    After obtaining access to the Capitol server system, the Awan brothers could control all aspects of a congressman system. They sold and configured the hardware setting permissions and remote access to maintain the devices remotely. Essentially the keys to the kingdom. Through congressional requests they managed to completely compromise the network. They could read email, transfer files, install applications (i.e. key loggers). The latter reports that the systems and network were completely compromised. Beyond that, Imran had bypassed IT key loggers and reporting systems by gaining remote access directly to congressional computers.

    House Hacking Suspects Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received
    The central IT staffer said any suggestion that the brothers’ access didn’t span the full gamut of congressional intrigue was silly because they were the ones giving out permissions.

    The problem is that once they bypassed internal security there was no logging of their actions. House authorities set their sights on the possibility that a remote server had been used to transfer files off of Congressional members computers. The investigation revealed that Imran had been stealing money, equipment, and over charging for services. In total for almost 10 years and almost 80 Democrat members of Congress were compromised.

    This is where things go hinkey. Rather than turning the case over to the FBI the case is turned over to U.S.C. Police. They are investigating the theft, not the data breach.

    Let's state that again...
    The USCP are investigation the theft of Equipment not the Loss Of Congressional Data.

    Congressional IT Staff Under Investigation In Alleged Procurement Scam
    “At the request of Members of Congress, the United States Capitol Police are investigating the actions of House IT support staff,” Malecki said in a statement. "No Members are being investigated. No arrests have been made. It should be noted that, administratively, House staff were asked to update their security settings as a best practice. We have no further comment on the ongoing investigation at this time."
    The Bad Guy

    Two of the brothers, Imran and Jamal, have been linked to an emerging security breach

    The Awan brothers managed to get access to the Dems committee computers by just asking for the passwords. In addition the Awan brothers sold the congress outrageously priced equipment and broke into members of Congress' offices to steal equipment and or data.

    House staffers under criminal investigation for alleged equipment theft

    Five House employees are under criminal investigation amid allegations that they stole equipment from more than 20 member offices and accessed House IT systems without lawmakers' knowledge.

    More than 20 members were victimized by the alleged procurement scam and chiefs of staff for the lawmakers were briefed on the matter Thursday.

    The former staffer said “Jamal was always there,” but Imran would only work “odd hours.”

    And who is investigating this fiasco?
    Where is the FBI and why have they left it to the DC police? Is it a "limited hangout" they hope to bury by the promoting the administration's ties to Boris and Natasha?

    D.C. Metro police have been brought into the investigation rather than the F.B.I at the request of the Congressional members involved with the Awan Brothers.

    A source in the briefing said the Sergeant-at-Arms confirmed the U.S. Capitol Police is conducting an active criminal investigation but said no arrests have been made. The source said the FBI is not involved in the investigation.

    "At the request of members of Congress, the United States Capitol Police are investigating the actions of House IT support staff. No members are being investigated. No arrests have been made.

    Why aren't the FBI involved? I can only speculate, but it would mean that a FBI forensic team would have to comb through all of those congressional computers to determine the extent of the security compromise and data lost. The Dems just didn't seem up for the inconvenience of allowing the FBI investigation to go forward.

    The Awan Brothers had the keys to the kingdom. Physical security is paramount to cyber security. If a hacker has Physical access to a machine they own it. It is the simplest hack to conduct. The Anwar Bros had Debbie Wasserman Schultz's machine, along with Schultz, at least 80 other Dems also hired the Awan Brothers to provide IT support at significantly higher rates than normal IT support.

    Jamal, who public records suggest is only 22 years old and first began working in the House when he was 20, was paid nearly $160,000 a year, or three times the average House IT staff salary, according to InsideGov, which tracks congressional salaries. Abid was paid $161,000 and Imran $165,000.

    Democrats evidently paid the Awan brothers over $4 MILLION dollars.
    Despite the fact that these individuals, reportedly heavily in debt, would have failed security clearances they were able to receive top salary from Dems including members of the intelligence panel and members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the suspects on a shared basis. The two committees deal with many of the nation’s most sensitive issues, information and documents, including those related to the war on terrorism.

    Where's The Evidence? Hillary's Henchmen and the Awan Brothers Hack vs. MSM and Pelosi's Russia, Russia, Russia Meme

    Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who was shamed for the Democratic National Committee conspiracy against Bernie Sanders, recommended the Awan Brothers for their positions and Representative Jackie Speier asked for their TOP SECRET CLEARANCE.

    Whatever Happened with the Awan Brothers?
    frontpagemag | Last year, eight members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued a demand that their staffers be granted access to top secret classified information.

    The signatories to the letter were Andre Carson, Luis Guiterez, Jim Himes, Terri Sewell, Jackie Speier, Mike Quigley, Eric Swalwell and Patrick Murphy. All the signatories were Democrats. Some had a history of attempting to undermine national security.

    Beyond the debt, the brothers seemed to have, they had convictions for felony traffic offenses including DUI. Any one of these issues are enough to prevent or revoke a security clearance for normal folks. I guess things just work differently on Capitol Hill. The American military or college grads are denied clearances due similar issues in their record, but not these Pakistani brothers. Any one of these offenses would have caused me to fail my FBI background check at work, but congress can admit anybody. Do you see a problem here? Valerie Jarrett and Huma Abedin are perfect examples of the double standard in the government / Congress. Staffers of any background history can get clearances, but Dems seem to be able to prevent Trump's staff from getting clearance. What is going on here?
    Multiple small businesses and individuals went unpaid as a result of the 2012 bankruptcy. Abid also had an unpaid line of credit of $10,000 with the congressional credit union at the time of bankruptcy.

    Abid’s record includes numerous driving- and alcohol-related legal problems, including driving with a suspended or revoked license, court records show. He was found guilty of drunk driving a month before he started at the House, and was arrested for public intoxication a month after his first day. A felon normally commits the felony tens of times, maybe hundreds of times before they get caught. How many times does a Coke head commit a felony buying coke before they get caught? If they ever get caught, how many years do they get away with the crimes before they draw the attention of the authorities. The FBI, Congress, whatever never find the full scope of criminal activity. They may just get enough evidence to convict of a crime, but they never convict for all the crimes committed.

    What is really becoming obvious is the Democrats have irresponsibly opened our congressional security oversight to Middle Eastern Factions. These 5 are just one group that were exposed. Hillary had Huma, Obama had Vallery. A sharia practicing terrorist that believes in female circumcision leading a woman's March to equality in the 21st century. There are so many examples that one has to be purposefully obtuse to ignore the contradictions.

    While the nay sayers claim you can not connect the dots it is obvious that the dots were there for all to see and could have been connected. I would say that the deviation from standard security practices was intentional, but Podesta's password was password123 or some such nonsense. Who knows, our leaders may really be that incompetent. They haven't even made it to the minimum expectations to be employed in corporate America.

    I really don't know what to make of two very different groups with nothing but vaguely similar beliefs in Marxist ideals working together. Many of the thoughts I have on the subject are almost too extreme to believe, but the evidence is almost unavoidable. None of it makes sense unless someone is lying about their objectives.
    A Continuing DCNF Investigative Group Series

    House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs Committee Members Compromised By Rogue IT Staff
    1. Brothers Had Massive Debts, Years Of Suspicious Activity
    2. Secretly Took $100K In Iraqi Money
    3. Owed Money To Hezbollah-Connected Fugitive
    4. Received $4 Million From Dem Reps
    5. Allegedly Kept Stepmom In 'Captivity' To Access Offshore Cash
    6. Also Had Access To DNC Emails
    7. Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received
    8. Capitol Police ill-equipped to investigate data theft

    House Democrats fire two IT staffers amid criminal investigation By HEATHER CAYGLE 03/01/17 01:21 PM EST
    Two House Democrats this week fired technology staffers linked to an ongoing criminal investigation, more than a month after the couple in question was barred from House computer networks.

    Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) confirmed to Politico that Hina Alvi’s last day as an IT support staffer in his office was Tuesday. Her husband, Imran Awan, was working for Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) as of Tuesday evening, but a spokeswoman for Fudge said midday Wednesday that Awan was no longer an employee.

    Employee of Corruption Magnet Debbie Wasserman Schultz Under Criminal Investigation The Democratic Party is no stranger to criminal investigations

    CORRECTION February 2, 2017, at 9:13 p.m.
    This post has been updated and corrected with new information from US Capitol Police, which said no arrests have been made but there is an active investigation ongoing into IT staff who were involved in an alleged procurement scam. A lawmaker briefed on the situation had told BuzzFeed News that arrests were made.

    The Awan Brothers - Compromised at least 80 congressional computers and got paid 5 million to do it. We may never know the extent of the breach PART 2

    Starts to tell what really happened and how big the problem is...

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 4:08 pm

    BREAKING: Three White House Leakers of Classified Info Identified; Trump to Fire ‘Multiple People’
    Kristinn Taylor May 22nd, 2017

    Trey Yingst, the White House Correspondent for One America News Network, reported via Twitter Monday afternoon that President Donald Trump will fire ‘multiple people’ after three White House staffers were identified as leaking classified information.

    UPDATE: Video report at end of article.

    SCOOP: Three White House staffers have been identified for leaking classified info. POTUS will fire ‘multiple people’ when he returns to DC. I’m told the names of the leakers are being run by the Office of Government Ethics, which is why they aren’t immediately fired

    Names are given to the Office of Government ethics, who will investigate further.  I asked one source why the leakers names would be presented to the Office of Government Ethics. “This is criminal,” they said. Office of Government Ethics is not able to prosecute anyone. They will advise the White House on how to proceed with leakers, I’m told.”

    Three White House staffers have been identified for leaking classified info. POTUS will fire 'multiple people' when he returns to DC.

    — Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) 11:18 AM - 22 May 2017
    May 22, 2017

    Names are given to the Office of Government ethics, who will investigate further.

    — Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) May 22, 2017

    Trump’s White House has been beset by unprecedented leaking of classified information, including details of Trump’s phone calls and Oval Office meetings with foreign leaders.

    Trump is scheduled to return from a nine day trip to the Middle East and Europe on Saturday.

    Top Trump advisers Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and chief strategist Steve Bannon came back from the Middle East early on Sunday. The U.K. Daily Mail reported the White House said Priebus left the trip early for the roll out of Trump’s budget plan this week, however the Mail reported that no reason was given for Bannon’s early departure.

    UPDATE: Yingst has taken down a few tweets on the involvement of the Office of Government Ethics for further clarification, “Deleted a few tweets on the Office of Government Ethics. Will repost clearer info in a single tweet.”

    Deleted a few tweets on the Office of Government Ethics. Will repost clearer info in a single tweet.

    — Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) 12:13 PM - 22 May 2017
    Yingst posted the clarification, “OGE advises the White House on questions of ethics. Please accept my correction on an earlier tweet saying they ‘investigate.’ Thank you.”

    OGE advises the White House on questions of ethics. Please accept my correction on an earlier tweet saying they 'investigate.' Thank you.

    — Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) 12:43 PM - 22 May 2017
    The initial report by Yingst indicates that the White House staffers are not political appointees as they could be fired at will by Trump, but that they are career federal government employees or former Obama political appointees who were “burrowed” into the Civil Service by being converted to career employees before President Barack Obama’s term ended on January 20 and would in most cases have to go through a civil service procedure for termination.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 4:23 pm

    May 24, 2017

    Seth Rich “Trap” Fallen Into By FBI Directory Comey Warned Ready To Be Sprung

    Another intriguing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today detailing the surging “Deep State” war against President Donald Trump states that the Seth Rich “trap” gambit, which destroyed former FBI Director James Comey, appears ready to be sprung in its entirety—and whose effects once sprung will be the complete destruction of the US mainstream propaganda media and its leftist Democratic Party masters. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

    According to this report, Seth Rich was the Deputy Director Data for Voter Protection/Expansion who had helped develop a computer program for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) allowing people to type in their address and get a map to their polling place, but as a supporter of Bernie Sanders became appalled over Hillary Clinton’s “rigging the system” allowing her to become the Democratic Party nominee for president, thus causing him to release tens-of-thousands of secret DNC documents and emails to Wikileaks.

    With Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta having previously warned, on 22 February 2015, that “I’m definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it”, this report continues, the SVR became “alarmed/highly concerned” when, during early July 2016, intercepted signals traffic in the United States “suggested/leaned towards” that Seth Rich’s life might be in danger—and that SVR Director Mikhail Fradkov authorized an emergency contact between his agency and the US State Department to reveal the details of—but, and shockingly, when Russian diplomats presented the SVR findings to US authorities, on 7 July, they were immediately expelled from the United States—and as we had detailed in our 13 July 2016 report titled “Assassination Of Top US Democratic Party Official Leads To FBI Capture Of Clinton “Hit Team”.

    Three days later, on 10 July, this report grimly notes, Seth Rich was assassinated with his believed to be assassins captured by US federal police forces after a running gun battle two days later on 12 July—and who were named in their original charging documents as 19-year-old Keyante Edwards, 18-year-old Alpha Jalloh and 20-year-old Keith Jones—all three of whom have completely disappeared from all US record searches of those charged with and/or convicted of crimes.

    Of the most important of these three believed to be assassins of Seth Rich, this report says, is Alpha Jalloh, whom though identified in his Washington D.C charging document as being 18-years-old, the SVR had previously identified, in 2015, as being 26-years-old and a “high level fence and shipper” belonging to an international car theft criminal organization operating in New York City and New Jersey.

    In fact, this report continues, it was through the SVR’s electronic surveillance of Alpha Jalloh that concerns were first raised about Seth Rich when in early July, 2016, this international criminal, who had been “suspiciously” released after his 2015 arrest, and believed to be an FBI informant, was discovered to be in direct contact with both Hillary Clinton’s New York City campaign office and the DNC office in Washington D.C..

    As to how Seth Rich accomplished his sending of tens-of-thousands of secret Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party documents and emails to Wikileaks, this report explains, was through his “alliance/partnership” with the German-Finnish Internet entrepreneur named Kim Dotcom—who since 2012 has been in a protracted legal battle with the United States from his home in New Zealand.

    Kim Dotcom’s battle against the United States government, this report explains, was instigated by the Obama regime who were threatened by their powerful Hollywood elitist backers to shut his Megaupload file sharing website down (Hollywood threatened both the Democrats and Republicans that they would lose their massive financial support unless they targeted Kim Dotcom) because its subscriber-users were using this service to exchange movies and televisions programmes—but that the US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.

    Upon President Trump taking power in January, 2017, and his loathing the leftist-communistic Hollywood elite as much as Dotcom, this report further notes, Kim Dotcom began negotiations with the Trump administration to have all of his charges dropped in exchange for his providing evidence proving that Seth Rich, not Russia, released all the Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party documents and emails to Wikileaks—and that culminated in the unprecedented secret meeting between Kim Dotcom, FBI Director Comey and CIA Director Mike Pompeo in New Zealand on 23 April.

    The Trump administrations secret meeting with Kim Dotcom, however, was nearly thwarted though, this report continues, when FBI Director Comey arrived prior to CIA Director Pompeo in New Zealand to begin negotiations—but with Dotcom refusing to meet privately with Comey unless Pompeo was there too—and President Trump being so outraged at this “backstabbing” attempt, he fired Comey a fortnight later telling Russian officials that this FBI Director was a “nut job”.

    Two days after President Trump fired FBI Director Comey for his attempting to sabotage the negotiations with Kim Dotcom, this report details, the SVR reported that a “dark web” “kill order contract” worth 82,900 Bitcoin’s (now valued at over $198 million) had been issued against Trump—and though the SVR is not claiming responsibility, a highly-coded “dark web” conversation held between approximately 5 of these conspirators in the United States intelligence communities “Deep State” conspiring to assassinate President Trump was “released” to the public showing their plot plans, and as evidenced in their “conversations” held on Wednesday, 17 May from 2:31 pm to 3:15 pm—and reproduced below:

    Codes used in this “dark web” “Deep State” exchange include: "RR" for Robert Mueller, "MF" for Michael Flynn, and "Limey" for Christopher Steele, a former British MI6 intelligence officer

    Now cooperating with the “Deep State” against President Trump, this report says it’s important to note, is the family of Seth Rich, who are now represented by Brad Bauman, a radical leftist-communist and Democratic Party crisis communication expert advocating for the removal of Trump—but whose success can be noted in his being able to “arrange” the Fox News Network retracting their recent report showing the truth that Seth Rich leaked to Wikileaks, and his cowing the hugely popular rightist Fox News commentator Sean Hannity to “stand down” too.

    With this Democratic Party top dirty trickster Brad Bauman now openly attacking anyone investigating Seth Rich’s assassination by calling them “sociopaths”, this report concludes, Kim Dotcom, unlike Sean Hannity, is not being cowed, and has, instead, just hours ago, now openly declared his intentions to make the truth known in the United States itself by his stating on his website:

    “I know that Seth Rich was involved in the DNC leak.

    I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

    Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

    I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

    “He wanted to change that from the inside.”

    I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

    The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

    I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

    If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.”

    More interesting info at link:

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Wed May 24, 2017 4:27 pm

    Jim Stone: "They" Got To Hannity....
    Date: Wednesday, 24-May-2017 11:21:03

    There will be no further discussion of the murder of Seth Rich. If you discuss any murder committed by the Clinton crime family, you are fake news and will be taken out along with the people they murder.

    Don't be among the dreamers out there saying they are acting like this because they are losing, because if they can silence anyone they want, clearly they are not losing. They will remain in power for as long as the corrupted police forces and other security forces keep them there, and the fact that they are where they are only because the police see through to it means the police and other security forces are everyone's enemy, it is not just a ghetto meme.

    Kim Dotcom released a statement yesterday which made it clear Seth Rich did the leaks, but even Kim backed off and did not take it the whole way. Everyone seems too afraid to speak up, even in the face of completely clear and evident need. If we sit here silent and allow ourselves to be crushed for even a little bit longer, we will lose forever. They are on the brink of final, absolute, smack down victory and the future they have for us is the end of us, we will never escape a rapidly approaching technological enslavement and perfectly calculated tyranny.

    REMEMBER: The police acheive cooperation ONLY, AND ONLY with the threat of violence, killing, and the threat of imprisonment. That is 100 percent of what the police operate on. Either you cooperate or you will be smashed or killed or imprisoned, even if there was no crime when they got your attention. There is absolutely nothing other than that to the way they function - cooperate or you are gone.

    If the criminals in the government are operating with impunity and the police will do nothing to stop them, just because that is where the police draw their paycheck from and can be brainwashed, then obviously the criminals in government need a different mode of enforcement, from we the people, following through with the exact same tactics the police use against us. It is either that, or the end of all, and the shutting up of Sean Hannity proved it.

    "They" can do whatever they want, including murder, and we just have to suck it up. We can't even mention it, or we are gone all the while the same people who killed Seth Rich will bother us and possibly jail us over a garden. Folks, that's fair, right? As long as the law says you can't touch the murderers, it's all fair, because the law is ALL, right? Let the murderers walk free, without anyone being allowed to even say anything happened when they murder, but YOU can go to jail for your tomato plants if they are not approved. That's all fair and good, as long as the law, and those who enforce the law, make it so, RIGHT?

    If you are not going to police the police, and put justice where it is needed you might as well grind up your guns and use them as an iron supplement in your morning cereal. That's what they are good for. After all, only the police can actually use one, even if it is to enforce and support corruption at the highest level, RIGHT?. Any good citizen who follows the law ought to know their guns are only for play and target practice. You had better damn well never use one to put things "right". You ought to know that you, and especially your kids, are not supposed to have a future, your child's future belongs to those who murdered Seth Rich, and Sean Hannity just proved it. It will be so, for as long as you suck it up and eat your cheerios.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Thu May 25, 2017 10:11 am

    Comey Had Secret Russian Document Exposing Clinton, Soros, Lynch Collusion

    The Washington Post is reporting on collusion between Russia, the US Attorney General, the Clinton Campaign, George Soros and James Comey, with each playing a different role related to a particular document of supposed Russian Intelligence. It is a very unusual source for a document critical of any Democrat, let alone the inner circle of power in 2016. The motivation for doing so, with the natural exclusion an obligation to truthfully inform the public in the case of the Washington Post. Are they merely setting up another piece or multiple pieces of disinformation, perhaps more protection for the guilty Democrats? They wrote on May 24th:

    “Current and former officials have said that document played a significant role in the July decision by then-FBI Director James B. Comey to announce on his own, without Justice Department involvement, that the investigation was over. That public announcement — in which he criticized Clinton and made extensive comments about the evidence — set in motion a chain of other FBI moves that Democrats now say helped Trump win the presidential election.

    But according to the FBI’s own assessment, the document was bad intelligence — and according to people familiar with its contents, possibly even a fake sent to confuse the bureau. The Americans mentioned in the Russian document insist they do not know each other, do not speak to each other and never had any conversations remotely like the ones described in the document. Investigators have long doubted its veracity, and by August the FBI had concluded it was unreliable.

    The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.

    The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.

    In the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.

    Current and former officials have argued that the secret document gave Comey good reason to take the extraordinary step over the summer of announcing the findings of the Clinton investigation himself without Justice Department involvement.

    Comey had little choice, these people have said, because he feared that if Lynch announced no charges against Clinton, and then the secret document leaked, the legitimacy of the entire case would be questioned.”

    Somehow one email supposedly sent by Russians was sufficient to counter the tens or hundreds of thousands sent by Clinton and justify, in the backwards brain of James Comey the idea that she should be let of f the hook?

    Shouldn’t it, if anything, have motivated him to investigate Lynch, Wasserman Shutlz, Soros, and the other players in addition to Clinton, not just to call the whole thing off?

    Maybe this is one of those things that Congress might want to ask the corrupt former FBI Director about if and when he comes before their committees, his insistence on not finding a crime where many clearly existed and his own reasons for adopting that position.

    From the moment the bureau received the document from a source in early March 2016, its veracity was the subject of an internal debate at the FBI. Several people familiar with the matter said the bureau’s doubts about the document hardened in August when officials became more certain that there was nothing to substantiate the claims in the Russian document. FBI officials knew the bureau never had the underlying email with the explosive allegation, if it ever existed.

    Yet senior officials at the bureau continued to rely on the document before and after the election as part of their justification for how they handled the case.

    Thank you for reading and sharing my work – Please look for me, Rick Wells

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 12:21 am

    Declassified memos show FBI illegally shared spy data on Americans with private parties

    May 25, 2017

    WATCH: Circa's Sara Carter explains the extensive nature in which raw intelligence was shared by the FBI:

    The FBI has illegally shared raw intelligence about Americans with unauthorized third parties and violated other constitutional privacy protections, according to newly declassified government documents that undercut the bureau’s public assurances about how carefully it handles warrantless spy data to avoid abuses or leaks.

    In his final congressional testimony before he was fired by President Trump this month, then-FBI Director James Comey unequivocally told lawmakers his agency used sensitive espionage data gathered about Americans without a warrant only when it was “lawfully collected, carefully overseen and checked.”

    Once-top secret U.S. intelligence community memos reviewed by Circa tell a different story, citing instances of “disregard” for rules, inadequate training and “deficient” oversight and even one case of deliberately sharing spy data with a forbidden party.

    For instance, a ruling declassified this month by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) chronicles nearly 10 pages listing hundreds of violations of the FBI’s privacy-protecting minimization rules that occurred on Comey’s watch.

    The behavior the FBI admitted to a FISA judge just last month ranged from illegally sharing raw intelligence with unauthorized third parties to accessing intercepted attorney-client privileged communications without proper oversight the bureau promised was in place years ago.

    The court also opined aloud that it fears the violations are more extensive than already disclosed.

    “The Court is nonetheless concerned about the FBI’s apparent disregard of minimization rules and whether the FBI is engaging in similar disclosures of raw Section 702 information that have not been reported,” the April 2017 ruling declared.

    The court isn’t the only oversight body to disclose recent concerns that the FBI’s voluntary system for policing its behavior and self-disclosing mistakes hasn’t been working.

    The Justice Department inspector general’s officedeclassified a report in 2015 that reveals the internal watchdog had concerns as early as 2012 that the FBI was submitting ‘deficient” reports indicating it had a clean record complying with spy data gathered on Americans without a warrant.

    The FBI normally is forbidden from surveilling an American without a warrant. But Section 702 of the Foreign Surveillance Act, last updated by Congress in 2008, allowed the NSA to share with the FBI spy data collected without a warrant that includes the communications of Americans with “foreign targets.”

    But the FISA court watchdogs suggest FBI compliance problems began months after Section 702 was implemented.

    The FBI’s very first compliance report in 2009 declared it had not found any instances in which agents accessed NSA intercepts supposedly gathered overseas about an American who in fact was on U.S. soil.

    But the IG said it reviewed the same data and easily found evidence that the FBI accessed NSA data gathered on a person who likely was in the United States, making it illegal to review without a warrant.

    “We found several instances in which the FBI acquired communications on the same day that the NSA determined through analysis of intercepted communications that the person was in the United States,” the declassified report revealed.

    It called the FBI’s first oversight report “deficient” and urged better oversight.

    FBI officials acknowledged there have been violations but insist they are a small percentage of the total counterterrorism and counterintelligence work its agents perform.

    Almost all are unintentional human errors by good-intentioned agents and analysts under enormous pressure to stop the next major terror attack, the officials said.

    Others fear these blunders call into the question the bureau’s rosy assessment that it can still police itself when it comes to protecting Americans’ privacy 17 years after the war on terror began.

    That doubt, heaviest among civil libertarian Democrats but also growing among Republicans, is particularly sensitive because the law that allows the bureau to access warrantless spy data about Americans - Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - is up for renewal later this year.

    Lawmakers in both parties and both chambers of Congress are writing reforms behind closed door, leaving the intelligence community anxious it might lose some of the spy powers it considers essential to fighting terrorism, cyber attacks and unlawful foreign influence.

    “No one on the Hill wants to look like we are soft on terrorism when you have increasing threats like Manchester-style attacks. But the evidence of abuse or sloppiness and the unending leaks of sensitive intelligence in the last year has emboldened enough of us to pursue some reforms,” a senior congressional aide told Circa, speaking only on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to talk to the media. “Where that new line between privacy and security is drawn will depend on how many more shoes fall before the 702 renewal happens.”

    Rep. Trent Frank, R-Ariz., a member of the House Judiciary Committee that will help craft the 702 renewal legislation, said the rising revelation of problems about improper spying on Americans are having an effect on lawmakers who have long supported the intelligence community.

    “The bottom line is the law has to be followed and when it isn’t there has to be consequence that is of significance so that it deters others from breaking the same law,” he told Circa.

    One of the biggest concerns involves so-called backdoor searches in which the FBI can mine NSA intercept data for information that may have been incidentally collected about an American. No warrant or court approval is required, and the FBI insists these searches are one of the most essential tools in combating terrorist plots.

    But a respected former Justice Department national security prosecutor questions if the searching has gotten too cavalier. AmyJeffress, the former top security adviser to former Attorney General Eric Holder, was appointed by the intelligence court in 2015 to give anindependent assessmentof the FBI’s record of compliance.

    Jeffress concluded agents’ searches of NSA data now extend far beyond national security issues and thus were “overstepping” the constitutional protections designed to ensure the bureau isn’t violating Americans’ 4th Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.

    “The FBI procedures allow for really virtually unrestricted querying of the Section 702 data in a way the NSA and CIA have restrained it through their procedures,” she argued before the court in a sealed 2015 proceeding.

    “I think that in this case the procedures could be tighter and more restrictive, and should be in order to comply with the Fourth Amendment,” she added.

    The court thanked Jeffress for her thoughtful analysis but ultimately rejected her recommendation to impose on the FBI a requirement of creating a written justification why each search would help pursue a national security or criminal matter.

    The Justice Department argued in that matter that the extra restriction would keep FBI agents from connecting the dots in terror cases and compared NSA searches to something Americans do every day.

    “If we require our agents to write a full justification every time think about if you wrote a full justification every time you used Google. Among other things, you would use Google a lot less,” a lawyer told the court.

    That was late in 2015. But by early 2017, the court became more concerned after the Obama administration disclosed significant violations of privacy protections at two separate intelligence agencies involved in the Section 702 program.

    The most serious involved the NSA searching for American data it was forbidden to search. But the FBI also was forced to admit its agents and analysts shared espionage data with prohibited third parties, ranging from a federal contractor to a private entity that did not have the legal right to see the intelligence.

    Such third-party sharing is a huge political concern now as Congress and intelligence community leaders try to stop the flow of classified information to parties that could illegally disclose or misuse it, such as the recent leak that disclosed intercepted communications between the Russian ambassador and Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

    The court’s memo suggested the FBI’s sharing of raw intelligence to third parties, at the time, had good law enforcement intentions but bad judgment and inadequate training.

    “Nonetheless, the above described practices violated the governing minimization procedures,” the court chided.

    A footnote in the ruling stated one instance of improper sharing was likely intentional.

    “Improper access” to NSA spy data for FBI contractors “seems to have been the result of deliberate decision-making,” the court noted.

    The recently unsealed ruling also revealed the FBI is investigating more cases of possible improper sharing with private parties that recently have come to light.

    The government “is investigating whether there have been similar cases in which the FBI improperly afforded non-FBI personnel access to raw FISA-acquired information on FBI systems,” the court warned.

    The ruling cited other FBI failures in handling Section 702 intel, including retaining data on computer storage systems “in violation of applicable minimization requirements.”

    Among the most serious additional concerns was the FBI’s failure for more than two years to establish review teams to ensure intercepts between targets and their lawyers aren’t violating the attorney-client privilege.

    “Failures of the FBI to comply with this ‘review team’ requirement for particular targets have been focus of the FISC’s (FISA’s?) concerns since 2014,” the court noted.

    The FBI said it is trying to resolve the deficiencies with aggressive training of agents.

    That admission of inadequate training directly undercut Comey’s testimony earlier this month when questioned by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

    “Nobody gets to see FISA information of any kind unless they've had the appropriate training and have the appropriate oversight,” the soon-to-be-fired FBI director assured lawmakers.

    The struggle for the intelligence court and lawmakers in providing future oversight will be where to set more limits without hampering counterterrorism effort

    The FBI told Circa in a statement, "As indicated in its opinion, the Court determined that the past and current standard minimization procedures are consistent with the Fourth Amendment and met the statutory definition of those procedures under Section 702."

    Jeffress, however, warned in her 2015 brief of another dynamic that will pose a challenge too, an FBI culture to use a tool more just because it can.

    “These scenarios suggest a potentially very large and broad scope of incidental collection of communications between a lawful target and U.S. persons that are not the type of communications Section 702 was designed to collect,” she told the court in a written memo.

    And when questioned at a subsequent hearing, Jeffress observed: “I don’t think that the FBI will voluntarily set limits on its querying procedures, because law enforcement agencies tend not to take steps to restrict or limit what they can do, for obvious reasons.”

    Circa congressional correspondent Kellan Howell contributed to this story.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 10:52 am

    Former Hillary Clinton Employee Arrested On Treason Charges
    April 12, 2017 Baxter Dmitry News, US 264

    Candace Marie Claiborne has become the first Clinton-era State Department employee indicted on treason charges, after a federal grand jury indicted her on numerous felony charges.
    Candace Marie Claiborne has become the first Clinton-era State Department employee indicted on treason charges, after a federal grand jury indicted her for conspiring to defraud the U.S. government, concealing contact with foreign spies, obstructing an official proceeding, and making false statements to the FBI.

    Claiborne, a veteran State Department employee who possessed a Top Secret security clearance, concealed her extensive contacts with Chinese intelligence agents, who for years lavished her with thousands of dollars in gifts as part of a pay-for-play scheme, according to a Department of Justice press release.

    In addition to cash payments, Chinese spies provided Claiborne with vacations, an apartment, Apple electronics, and tuition to a Chinese fashion school, according to the indictment. Suggesting she learned tricks from Hillary Clinton, her former boss, Claiborne allegedly told co-conspirators to delete all emails and evidence after getting caught.

    The bill of charges contains numerous felonies and Claiborne, 60, is facing spending the rest of her life behind bars, as prosecutors warn she is “the first of many” corrupt Clinton-era State Department employees that will be bought to justice by a reinvigorated DOJ.

    “Candace Marie Claiborne is a U.S. State Department employee who possesses a Top Secret security clearance and allegedly failed to report her contacts with Chinese foreign intelligence agents who provided her with thousands of dollars of gifts and benefits,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General McCord.

    “Claiborne used her position and her access to sensitive diplomatic data for personal profit. Pursuing those who imperil our national security for personal gain will remain a key priority of the National Security Division.”

    He added: “This case demonstrates that U.S. government employees will be held accountable for failing to honor the trust placed in them when they take on such sensitive assignments.”

    “Candace Claiborne is accused of violating her oath of office as a State Department employee, who was entrusted with Top Secret information when she purposefully mislead federal investigators about her significant and repeated interactions with foreign contacts,” said Assistant Director in Charge Vale.

    “The FBI will continue to investigate individuals who, though required by law, fail to report foreign contacts, which is a key indicator of potential insider threats posed by those in positions of public trust.”

    The grand jury found Claiborne’s Washington, D.C. home and her savings account are subject to forfeiture, if she’s convicted.

    She wrote in a journal that she could “generate 20k in 1 year” through one of her Chinese agents, according to an affidavit. She was allegedly wired nearly $2,500 shortly after and was asked to provide the U.S. government’s analyses of its 2011 economic talks with China.

    According to the Department of Justice’s press release, Claiborne is facing decades behind bars for her crimes:

    “The maximum penalty for a person convicted of obstructing an official proceeding is 20 years in prison. The maximum penalty for making false statements to the FBI is five years in prison. The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes. If convicted of any offense, the sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.”
    Read more at:

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 11:00 am

    Congressman Demands Feds Investigate DNC Whistleblower Murder
    May 26, 2017

    Republican Congressman Blake Farenthold is demanding a Federal investigation into the murder of DNC whistleblower Seth Rich. Farenthold told CNN that he believes Congress should launch a special investigation into the suspicious circumstances surrounding Seth’s murder. There is complete panic in the highest levels of the DNC over the Seth Rich murder investigation which makes us even more suspicious that the DNC had something to do with it.

    Why wouldn’t they want this murder solved?… What are they afraid of?

    On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

    Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

    Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 11:46 am
    Published on May 25, 2017
    Sub for more: | Danny Gold for Liberty Writers reports, Today Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the former DNC chair who rigged the 2016 primaries for Hillary Clinton, promised to abuse her power for personal revenge on a top cop. She said there will be “Consequences” if he doesn’t hand over evidence – a laptop she owns that they are investigating.

    Actually the entire IT team fled to Pakistan.

    Did Several Democratic IT Staffers Under Investigation Just Flee to Pakistan?
    First a little background. Politico reported the following back in March.

    Two House Democrats this week fired technology staffers linked to an ongoing criminal investigation, more than a month after the couple in question was barred from House computer networks.

    Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) confirmed to Politico that Hina Alvi’s last day as an IT support staffer in his office was Tuesday. Her husband, Imran Awan, was working for Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) as of Tuesday evening, but a spokeswoman for Fudge said midday Wednesday that Awan was no longer an employee.

    As of Wednesday, Awan was still working as a technology adviser for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), although he’s been blocked from accessing the House computer system since early February.

    Alvi, Awan and three other House aides, including Abid Awan and Jamal Awan, relatives of Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas, are all linked to the criminal investigation being conducted by the U.S. Capitol Police.

    The five current and former House staffers are accused of stealing equipment from members’ offices without their knowledge and committing serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the probe.

    Awan made nearly $2 million since starting as an IT support staffer for House Democrats in 2004, according to public salary data. Alvi, who worked for House Democrats beginning in 2007, earned more than $1.3 million as an IT staffer during that time.

    As shared employees, Awan, Alvi and their relatives worked for dozens of House Democrats at a time, meaning no one lawmaker was responsible for paying their full salary.

    With that out of the way, here’s some of what The Daily Caller reported yesterday:

    A criminal suspect in an investigation into a major security breach on the House of Representatives computer network has abruptly left the country and gone to Pakistan, where her family has significant assets and VIP-level protection, a relative and others told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

    Hina Alvi, her husband Imran Awan, and his brothers Abid and Jamal were highly paid shared IT administrators working for multiple House Democrats until their access to congressional IT systems was terminated Feb. 2 as a result of the investigation. Capitol Police confirmed the investigation is ongoing, but no arrests have been reported in the case.

    The Awans are “accused of stealing equipment from members’ offices without their knowledge and committing serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network,” according to Politico. Many of the Democrats who employed the Awans are members of the House Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. (A list of potentially compromised members is listed below.)

    Their positions gave them access to members’ emails and confidential files. In addition, Imran was given the password for an iPad used by then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat. The five came to the U.S. from Pakistan.

    Since the investigation became public, the Awans have abruptly moved from longtime homes in Lorton and Springfield, Va.

    Imran and Hina recently withdrew their children from their schools, according to members of the Holly Elementary and Lorton Station Middle school communities. Multiple people said Hina told them she was headed to Pakistan where the family has significant property.

    Real estate records show Hina listed both the Lorton house and an apartment she owns for sale.

    “I came to know from one of their relatives that Hina Alvi and her daughters are moved to Pakistan, Hina Alvi saying ‘we have moved here in Pakistan permanently,’” the Awans’ stepmother, Samina Gilani, told TheDCNF.

    Two other sources close to the family, who requested anonymity because they believe it is a “national security issue,” also said that Hina has gone to Pakistan.

    Gilani said in court documents the Awan brothers have convinced Pakistani officials that they are VIPs and travel the country with a police motorcade — an assertion that seemingly gives them a major incentive to seek protection there, as well as raising questions about how the computer jockeys obtained that status.

    Imran, who has worked for Wasserman Schultz since 2005, “boasted he had many contacts in USA and Pakistan also. He also said that if [I called even] the whole United States police on them,” he would not face consequences, Gilani told TheDCNF. “Imran Awan threatened that he is very powerful” and would use that power to have people kidnapped in Pakistan, she said in court documents.

    I’m not sure what to make of this, or if all of the above is even true, but the entire saga seems like something we should be aware of.

    If you enjoyed this post, and want to contribute to genuine, independent media, consider visiting our Support Page.

    In Liberty,
    Michael Krieger

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 11:49 am

    Federal Prosecutor Found Dead on Florida Beach - Investigating DNC Mail Fraud

    HOLLYWOOD, Fla. (AP) -- The body of a federal prosecutor has been found on a Florida beach with possible head trauma.

    Hollywood police spokeswoman Miranda Grossman said Thursday that the body of 37-year-old Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. was found early Wednesday by a passerby on the city's beach. She said detectives are trying to determine if the death was a homicide, suicide or something else.

    Whisenant worked for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami in its major crimes unit. He had joined the office in January. Court records show he had been handling several visa and passport fraud cases.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Posts : 21920
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Carol on Fri May 26, 2017 12:18 pm
    Confirmed: Federal Investigator Claims Seth Rich Leaked 44k Emails To Wikileaks

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    Sponsored content

    Re: SPIES & LIES - PART 1

    Post  Sponsored content

      Current date/time is Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:48 pm