tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~


    Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    Share
    avatar
    mudra

    Posts : 18366
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 62
    Location : belgium

    Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    Post  mudra on Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:35 pm

    Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    By Kevin Scott King

    Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, London 7/7 bombings, Madrid train bombings, Osama bin Laden Capture/Death, 2011 Norway Attacks, Charlie Hebdo, Boston bombing, Sandy Hook, JFK, RFK, MLK, Pearl Harbor, Lusitania, USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Aurora, CO shooting, Charleston church shooting, Tucson, AZ shooting, Port Arthur, AUS, all very real illusions.

    The purpose of this article is to break down false-flag events into their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally when one thinks or speaks of a false-flag event they are referring to the Main Event. This presentation is about the entire operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.

    Note: What follows is but a brief or summary of a much larger project. I am posting this to the community at large to inspire others to turn this into a full-fledged project which could include a website, presentation(video), and book. Further details can be found at the end of this article.

    What is a False-Flag?

    What exactly is a false-flag, why is it called false-flag? The term false-flag is a naval term from the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a country other than the one to which the ship belonged. This was done for multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false-flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport to use false-flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under one. To the point that it was never done. But that was a different age…

    The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military origin of its name, goes as follows. Country A’s King wants to conquer and loot Country B’s land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally involved… anger, hatred, revenge. Now the skilled orator and manipulator might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an army if one’s country has been attacked, hence you are acting in defense. And this is where the false-flag comes in. Country A’s King and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself, claiming that the attackers were from Country B. The attack needs to be big enough to create real panic and fear, and for maximum effect there needs to be real deaths. The attackers need to be convincing in their role as soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match appropriately. The likelihood of success of the attack is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use mercenaries. Regardless, a successful attack will incense the populace against the ‘evil’ Country B and, therefore, justify an invasion.

    The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag. However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not its specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a fabrication. One defining characteristic is that the real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or director/producer of the ‘production’ is unknown. The audience’s attention is locked on the stage; the villain, clearly identified through the official narrative, is known. But who are behind the curtains? When a staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real perpetrators, not the actors on the stage. Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?

    The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. From the example above, the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the population’s reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.
    Why use False-Flags?

    As explained in the previous section, the classic false-flag was used to justify an invasion of another country. But there are numerous motivations for using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution. If the change that the leader(s) want is not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change. So the false-flag is a tool of manipulation(deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on the world stage. While the audience, the 99.9% of the world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by these ‘engineers’ from the moment of their birth until the time of their passing. They (we) are actually unknowing-unwilling participants in the machinations of the .1%.

    Göring: Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.

    Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

    Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

    From an interview between Gustave Gilbert, an American psychologist, and Hermann Göring during the Nuremberg Trials. Found in the book; Nuremberg Diary

    Reality-based Community… “The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, “Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush,” quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove):

    “The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” … “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

    On December 1st 1941, 80+% of the US population was against getting involved in the war in Europe. FDR wanted the US to join the war, a now well-established fact. So how does FDR convince the US population to participate in a war across the ocean that they do not want to be in? The US took 8 steps to incense the Japanese and encourage or force them to attack. The US had broken the diplomatic and military codes of the Japanese in the ’30s. The US knew what they were up to. The Japanese diplomats were to declare war on the morning of Dec 7 before the attack, but this meeting was intentionally delayed. Thus the claim of a ‘surprise’ attack could be maintained, and the surprise, horror, shock of the attack was used to manipulate the population into joining WWII. The Army and Naval commanders (General Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel) at Pearl Harbor, who were blamed for failing to be ready and immediately dismissed, were both exonerated in ’44. Both the Navy Court and the Army Board found Washington guilty. That officials within the US Govt knew the attack was coming but failed to pass this information on to the appropriate personnel.
    Proven False-Flags

    Iran-Contra
    Watergate
    Operation Gladio
    Operation Northwoods
    Gulf of Tonkin
    Pearl Harbor

    So you’re not convinced false-flags are real. Fair enough, nothing wrong with being skeptical. Let’s then look at events that have been ‘officially’ exposed. One of the most significant is Operation Gladio, for not only was it blown wide open, but it clearly demonstrates state sponsored terrorism. After WWII British MI6 and the CIA created and supported right-wing terrorist groups throughout Europe in which many innocents were killed. The purpose was to blame the terrorism on left-wing groups, using a ‘strategy of tension’, and thus gain support for more government powers. This program went on for many decades, and though officially Gladio may have shut down, it obviously continues unabated.

    read on: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/anatomy-of-false-flag-events.html

    Love Always
    mudra
    avatar
    B.B.Baghor

    Posts : 1851
    Join date : 2014-01-31
    Age : 66
    Location : Druid county UK

    Re: Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    Post  B.B.Baghor on Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:46 pm

    Part of mudra's post above:

    "Göring: Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.

    Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

    Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

    From an interview between Gustave Gilbert, an American psychologist, and Hermann Göring during the Nuremberg Trials. Found in the book; Nuremberg Diary"

    Awesome, mudra, thank you for finding this info and share it with us! To me that's a post very valuable to discern and understand better what false flag events are, or rather, what the minds are. creating them. I really appreciate the tone in which it's presented. It seems, increasingly, that besides efforts to judge people as good or evil in a black and white moral movie of oneself, there's a dynamic in societies too, that causes their members to be victim and bully both.

    These days I've more or less caught up with events that happened in Holland, during the last half year of 2015. A Dutch journalist and antropologist, Joris Luyendijk, presented, in July last year, his bestseller book "Swimming with sharks" an English title of the original Dutch version "Het kan niet waar zijn". A book about the banking system, a report with nuanced views. In one of the videos where Joris explains his work and style of research, he shares his experiences as journalist, in the years of the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein.

    In his efforts to find truth, Joris had to share daily life with hosts and families in their homes, also having conversations with passers by in the streets. Took him many years, before he began to grasp that the structure of those societies with dictators at the top, is causing people to give in to temptations of grasping power and means of control (active/activist) as much as being present on the other side(passive/pacifist?) over which the power is yielded and in which control is entwined with survival. That means, that those who are active and in touch with many other people, for whatever reason, are both bully and victim in playing their role.

    By continuing that dance on this thin moral rope, at least viewed from a Calvinistic point of view with God as authority to decide for us, good or bad, this dance in daily life on all levels, within one and the same person, becomes a perpetual motion in need of that duet. It's almost as if that dynamic's purpose has shifted, from having an impact on the outside world, to becoming the "raison d'etre" within the minds of its participants.

    Joris Luyendijk was eloquent and sincere, sharing his wonder and confusion, seeing that duality so clearly played out in that part of the world on the one hand and finding great hospitality and warmth on the other hand, in families he learned to know better, in their own homes. He's looking with nuances in his view at the banking system, for having had these experiences in the Arab world, where he traveled lots of years as a journalist and antropologist. At some point he was asked to be a political journalist for The Guardian.

    He finds great difficulty with the present dramatizing and manipulation of news, the erasure or photoshopping of what's "non grata" in the virtual opinion, based on a virtual entertainment bubble, tempting participants to develop a short span attention... and in that way... easily jump to quick assumptions. Voila... the perfect setting for false flag events make belief realities, hardly studied in depth. When the bubble bursts, they'll simply say "Oooh my" and sigh, quickly moving on to the next one. False flag events seem to flourish well in a condition shared by large parts of a population that is being fooled while window shopping for a reality. To me, it's a happy thing to know that in those same large parts of a population many begin to wake up, each in growing courage creating his/her own Cheerful
    avatar
    burgundia

    Posts : 5123
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Poland

    Re: Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    Post  burgundia on Sun Jul 02, 2017 6:10 am


    Sponsored content

    Re: Anatomy of False-Flag Events…

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:34 pm