~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

    How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain


    Posts : 3931
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  TRANCOSO on Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:51 am

    Electromagnetic radiation and its effect on the brain: an insider speaks out
    Jenny Crwys Williams interviews Barrie Trower, retired British military intelligence scientist in microwave and stealth warfare.
    19 april 2010


    Jenny Crwys-Williams: Now we're speaking to Barrie Trower, and it is Trower isn't it?
    Barrie Trower: Yes ma'am.

    JCW: And Barrie you are a retired British military intelligence scientist, and for years and years and years you worked in microwave and stealth warfare. What does that actually mean?
    BT: During the 1950s and 1960s during the Cold War, it was realised both by accident that microwaves could be used as stealth weapons against the Russians beamed the American embassy during the Cold War and it gave everybody working in the embassy cancer, breast cancers, leukemias whatever, and it was realised then that low level microwaves were the perfect stealth weapon to be used on dissident groups around the world, because you could make dissident groups sick, give them cancer, change their mental outlook on life without them even knowing they were being radiated, and one of my particular tasks...I spent eleven years questioning captured of my particular tasks was to learn the particular frequencies of microwaves that they used on which particular victims, if I may use that word, and what the outcome was, and I built up a dossier...I'm probably the only person in the world with the complete list...I built up a dossier of what pulse frequencies of microwaves will cause what psychological or physiological damage to a person.

    JCW: That's not covered under the official secrets act or anything like that, is it?
    BT: To be honest ma'am, I don't care about the official secrets act when I see what is going on in the world through...really ignorance...what I call ignorance. I think the official secrets act goes by the ball? They can do with me what they like, but I feel that it is my task to answer questions from governments, royalty, schools, anybody around the world, I tell them exactly what I know, exactly what I've done so that governments and organisations and people can actually make safe levels.

    JCW: Okay, so you did this work for eleven years, but you've also been involved, obviously, in stealth warfare microwave, and your particular expertise was on the impact of this radiation on health and brain functioning. BT: Absolutely.

    JCW: And you debriefed microwaved spies and dissidents and things as you explained to us. So what are you doing here in South Africa?
    BT: I was asked to come...
    JCW: ...stranded in South Africa...
    BT: ...stranded in South Africa, well, not stranded until tomorrow, uhm, there's a very young lady who was sitting outside...organised a series of lectures and talks for ... there's a little boy not far away with a tumour...near a transmitter and I was asked to go see the little boy and discuss what I knew ... uhm ... his majesty in Botswana asked me to give a conference, or present a conference to his ministers on, not only the health issues, but the environmental impact to the animals. I'm doing a public talk this evening for anybody to turn, it's really the young lady taking me around. I have a series of interviews, lectures, newspaper articles...anyone that really wants to know will just come and ask whatever questions they like to ask. So I'm here as a guest in what I think is the most beautiful country in the world without a shadow of a doubt, and I'm being taken around and asked questions which I'm answering.

    JCW: Alright, so just remember the lines are open, 883 0702 and if someone is erecting say a...we're talking cell phone masts, aren't we?
    BT: Cell phone...ordinary cell phone masts...and wi fi.

    JCW: Okay, and wi fi in your office...and...
    BT: Yup, and walkabout telephones...anything which emits microwaves.

    JCW: Okay, so if you've got any questions, give us a call on 8830702 and we've got an expert here and he has got information that very few people, I dare say, are privy to. So what is electromagnetic radiation? Just's the same thing as microwaves? Is that correct?
    BT: The electromagnetic spectrum is a band that goes from gamma rays and x-rays at one end, the very high energy waves, and it comes down through visible light, which is also some radiation, and then it goes through infrared microwaves, tv and radio. Now the only ones which really affect us in the communications industry are the microwaves, and microwaves have a special ability to interfere with water, which is how microwave ovens work, and we are made of water. All of our chemical and electrical signals involve water in the body, somehow, electrical communications in the body. So, the industry has picked the worst possible part of the electromagnetic spectrum to give to young children and to adults.

    JCW: And here we are talking about cell phones for instance...that's what you're talking about.
    BT: Cell phones yes, yes ma'am.

    JCW: So, if France for instance is saying that children should not be given mobile phones under the age of fourteen, for instance...uhm...the European parliament voted by a large majority to recommend tighter safety standards, and this included wi fi and whatever, but also protecting vulnerable groups like children...pregnant moms as well?
    BT: Absolutely ma'am...uhm...can I come back to your first point?

    JCW: Yes.
    BT: Uhm...I saw quite a large delegation from France a few years ago, and not just down to me, but they obviously took heed of what I said and went off and checked a few things, but, we know now in France, I'll have it published, that they are pulling wi fi out of every single French school, on health grounds.

    JCW: Now, presumably, they wouldn't have done that had they not known, or maybe seen the results of wi fi, because wi fi has probably been in schools in France for...what...ten years, or is that an exaggeration?
    BT: I don't know what the answer is. I don't know how long wi fi has been in French schools. I do know that they are spending now 174 million Euros rewiring wi fi sets with fiber optic cables or ordinary cables...uhm...because of the risk to the health...mainly to young women...that the health risk, and if you care to ask, I'll happily answer. The main risk from wi fi is to young girls, and the main risk which we children is to the fetus or the infant. But, children are much more vulnerable than adults...with this radiation, the smaller you are, the more you absorb. So, the main risk is to young girls and the fetus, or the infant.

    JCW: And, to young girls, are you talking about sterility for instance?
    BT: No ma'am, it's worse than that I'm afraid. I don't want to scare your listeners, but I believe in the truth. I have one other research papers here. I have three research papers. I am ascientific adviser to five organisations, which, part of my brief is I read international scientific papers, I retranslate them into a language that most people can understand, which is how I advise.
    Now to answer your question, ma'am, I have three papers showing that low level microwaves can interfere with the genetics in the ovarian follicles. Now what that means in everyday language, different from boys, young girls when they're born, they will have up to four hundred eggs in their ovaries. The microwaves can damage the genetic structure, we now know, in those ovaries. So, when this young girl grows up, gets married, and has children, if she has a daughter, this particular mitochondrial genetic damage is irreparable. There is nothing at all that can repair it.
    So, if she has a daughter, the daughter will carry that genetic deformity, and her daughter will carry it, and her daughter will carry it. So, it isn't a game anymore, it isn't a little box that you can press buttons and run around in, and have fun with, we are now seriously jeopardising the future generations for as long as there is a female line of our children's children's children, and that is to me the most scariest aspects of all of this.

    JCW: All right, now if you've just tuned in, we're chatting to Barrie Trower who is a retired British military intelligence scientist. For years and years he's worked in microwave and stealth warfare, and his particular expertise was on the impact of this radiation on health and brain functioning, and he is here. We are chatting about microwaves, we are talking about wi fi, we're talking about cell phone masts, we're talking about the damage done to vulnerable groups of people...everyone of course is vulnerable, but there's some groups that are more vulnerable than the others, and kids texting, and you know that they can spend hours and hours and hours texting is bad news. But give us a call on 883 0702 if you've got any questions, and we'll take them right after this.
    All right, well let's go to Lance, so Lance thank you, you've been holding on for quite some time, and you're chatting to Barrie Trower, and you've got a question.

    Lance: Yeah I do, thanks Jen. Barrie, I've got a question. We work in an office building, we're on the first floor, above us is a concrete ceiling and there's another floor and there's a concrete roof and then there's a cellular base station on top of that, and I must be honest, I'm not entirely happy about that and I'd like to my question is really sort of what are the implications of that? Is it actually quite dangerous number one and number two, is there something we can actually do to our ceiling, like literally foil it and then earth the foil, you know something like that to actually reduce these radiation?
    BT: The first part of your question with a transmitter on the roof, there is research from India, from a professor in India from the university, that shows that people living beneath a transmitter tend to suffer more neurological damage than people who do not have transmitters on their roof. In other words, you will have psychiatric problems, you will also have a reduced immune system. In other words, it could mean that you have more colds, more coughs, longer colds, longer coughs, and your general health could deteriorate. Uhm, that has been tested experimentally and published. The second part of your question sir, is there something you can do bursting a boil I believe you said, was that correct sir?

    Lance: Uhm, no-no-no-no-no, uhm, getting...putting foil, tin foil, in our roof.
    BT: Oh tin foil! I thought you said bursting a boil!
    Lance: Oh! No-no! Literally like putting tin strips, you know, roles that they put in the roof and earthing it. Something like that.
    BT: Yes sir, okay...uhm, this can be done sir, but not tin foil. Tin foil actually has little microscopic holes and lets the radiation through and in fact focuses it. Uhm, what you could use is aluminum tin, which they use in the building industry, radiator foil, aluminum foil, the thick insulating aluminum foil, that, between you and the roof, shiny side to the roof, that will reduce the radiation coming in.

    Lance: Okay.
    JCW: But Lance, on your behalf, if it reduces the radiation coming in, Barrie, it doesn't eliminate it, does it? So presumably then you are still at risk?
    BT: Without a doubt, yes, but less of a risk.
    JCW: Okay...Lance?
    Lance: Uhm...Jen? Sorry, can I...I missed the beginning of the show. I just want to ask Barrie...uhm...what like...uhm, how come you're actually the country?
    JCW: Well listen, I don't want to repeat everything, but he's now retired, he's a retired British military intelligence scientist, and for decades he's worked in microwave and stealth warfare, and this is his area of expertise, and he's been invited to South Africa to speak.
    Lance: Oh, okay cool, so not for soccer...
    JCW: No not for soccer, ~laughs~ bit early for that, and Josef, wi fi precautions?

    Josef: Ja, thank you Jenny and Barrie, uhm...
    BT: Good afternoon, sir.
    Josef: I'm...good afternoon. I'm aware that a lot of research has been done on this and there are many reports concerning the harmful effects of this kind of radiation, my concern number one, before I get to the precaution side is that if governments are resisting the actual truth on these reports because it would affect revenue, but secondly I'm also aware that there are precautions that certain companies have taken in manufacturing ?, certain ? that can be attached to one's cell phone, to one's laptop, to one's microwave...can be inserted in plug points in order to minimise the harmful effects of the radiation and in fact change the frequencies so that the body actually sees them as healthy frequencies as opposed to harmful frequencies. Can you elaborate on that?
    BT: Uhm, could I answer the first...I was concentrating on the second. What was the first question? Sorry.

    Josef: The first question was that governments seem to be deliberately resisting the actual reports.
    BT: Yes, can I answer that part first, and then we'll come to the second part. Uhm, when I address governments, what they don't realise is that there is an initial boost to the government from the industry, putting up towers, and paying rent and anything else that is being paid, but I was talking to a government just two weeks ago, and I said can you really afford this system unregulated, and I'll tell you why, sir, because most of the money generated from the cell phones, apart from the tax, leaves the country. It's estimated that from the illnesses, the health bill could go up as much as forty percent in some countries, and they're not prepared for that. May I just finish, sir. The third aspect of this, and this has been calculated by The Times, an editor in The Times, that the cost to the planet in making the pollinating insects sick, that pollinate the plants that feed the planet, the cost could be as much as thirty three trillion, that's a million million, US dollars a year. So, when it comes to profit, there may be a lovely initial boost for the government, but when I address governments, I say, have your economists actually sat down and worked out the real cost of all of this, and they haven't. That's the first part of your question, sir, the second part was...

    JCW: Well I think you've answered that in full. Let's move on. Ryan, you've touched on the answer that Barrie has just given about pollinating insects, and your question is about bee colony collapse disorder? Hi there Ryan... All right, Ryan from Gallow Manor asked the question about bees which are in trouble, and that of course is pollination, that's what we're talking about.
    BT: I could expand on that, just one thing.
    JCW: Yes.
    BT: I've done a lot of research on bees, and in fact I gave a lecture just before I came to this country. The bees are out of all of the insects, all of the animals that are affected, bees are affected worst. And the reason is, is that they are the size that the frequency of the microwaves can react with most. They have three different types of iron in their bodies that help them navigate, they use the earth's magnetic field to navigate, but the microwaves going through the bees, will remagnetise what they use for the earth's magnetic field, so they are disorientated.
    And the other part, and this has been published in Nature, the planet's foremost scientific journal. They have found that the bees' visual navigation system where they use the sun, that is also affected by all microwave frequencies, so the bottom line is, bees will get lost, their immune systems will suffer and then eventually whatever illness they come across, the varroa mite, anything, that will then take its course. But the bottom line here is that migratory insects, even ants, will be disorientated.

    JCW: All right, so give us a call, 883 0702. I've got a whole lot of questions I want to ask, Barrie, and yes they do revolve around cell phones, children, masts in playgrounds and masts in buildings and things like that. Should we be concerned, or should we just lie back and take it as it's given to us? Now Barrie, before we get onto cell phone masts and things like that, what does the World Health Organisation say about what you are saying?
    BT: The World's a very good question. The World Health Organisation were challenged by the European parliament very recently, on their stance. The World Health Organisation replied in writing to the European parliament, and I have that document here. The first thing they said was that they will not give any form of comments or estimate of the impact of this, health wise, until 2015, and they also said that they only started to study the effect on children, last year. So that may be in fifteen years, fourteen years time. So the World Health Organisation are not actually saying anything.

    JCW: So, how could they have been so lax as not to start, because the rumours have been going around for years and years and years and years. One would have liked to have thought that they would have picked up earlier on.
    BT: There are to my knowledge legal issues here where parliaments are questioning the decision making processes of the World Health Organisation, and this is an opinion that there may be industrial influences with the committee that helps run the World Health Organisation, and I do know there are legal questions headed that way, but, everybody including myself is bemused, because a few years ago, we looked at the World Health Organisation's database on electromagnetic radiation of the microwave communication frequencies, and eighty percent of all of their data showed either cancer increases, neurological disorders, what they call microwave syndrome, which is electro sensitivity. Eighty percent of their research showed this, but they were doing nothing about it.

    JCW: What is the Bio-Initiative Report?
    BT: The Bio-Initiative Report, it really flew in the face of the World Health Organisation's lack of support. Two I tell a lie...several scientists from around the world, leading scientists from around the world, spent many years studying the latest two thousand research papers. They cross checked them, they read them, they looked at them, they argued, the discussed, and the scientists who wrote the Bio-Initiative Report, they decided on a safe level that would include children, and they listed all of the illnesses and they came out with this safe level that they considered with today's knowledge, today's experts, a safe level for children and everybody else for a lifetime's exposure.
    They published this safe level, and anybody can read it and anybody can use it. To my knowledge it's been picked up by six or eight governments so far, two were already on it, and I think another six have decided to ignore the international guidelines, ignore the World Health Organisation, and to go straight to the Bio-Initiative safety level.

    JCW: How long is it before you start showing, for instance if there's a mast in a child's playground, and you've got children going there every single day apart from school holidays, how long does it take before some of them might start showing symptoms, and theirs can be things such as nausea for instance, or dizziness or rashes and things like that, there's the initial stages are they not?
    BT: Absolutely correct. The three percent, we know from experiments from around the world, the minimum that will show signs instantly, almost instantly, within minutes, is three percent, so, if you have a hundred children in your school, three of them will show signs straight away. The Nobel Prize winning Irish Doctors Association believe it's probably nearer fifteen percent, but I'm settling for three at the moment. So we know three percent initially, and then, depending on the child's state of health and a few other factors, probably within eighteen months to a few years, you will then have the more serious symptoms starting to show.

    JCW: What about houses that are in the proximity of that particular mast for instance?
    BT: Absolutely the same, ma'am, absolutely the same. Children are everywhere. The problem we find with schools...and may I just say that may I just come in with a piece of research please? In 2003, there was an international study of schools in just France and Spain, and they found a hundred and thirty leukemia clusters in schools that had transmitters in the playground. Just a few years later I was invited to address the Welch parliament, and I found another forty seven, so, by the end of 2006, between England, France and Spain, we had over two hundred leukemia clusters in schools of eleven children or more, aged eleven or under. That is over two thousand children.

    JCW: Right, well that's...I mean that is an alarming statistic. What about adults? What about teachers? What about people living in the houses nearby that are not children?
    BT: The report I wrote, and I'm having it published soon, but I've left copies behind, I've referenced the report that looked at all the schools and they did find that there was elevated breast cancer. The first symptom in a lady tends to be breast cancer if it's going to be serious. There was elevated breast cancer in the teachers, psychological problems, general ill I've travelled, and I have been right around the world, and I say to any school and any of your listeners now can check this, anyone, I say if you have a transmitter in your school, I will guarantee, absolutely guarantee two things; first, the sickness level will go up, and that includes staff, and the behaviour of the children and the exam results will go down.

    JCW: All right, well that's a huge claim. What area are we talking about? What circumference are we talking about?
    BT: No mobile transmitter should be within a kilometer and a half of a school, if it is an ordinary transmitter, putting out an ordinary 20 Watt microwave beam. It should certainly not be within a kilometer and a half of any school.

    JCW: If it's in the middle of a high street and it's on top of a two storey building?
    BT: No, it shouldn't be there. There is no reason for microwave transmitters to be near people. They can be moved far away from people. The only reason they're near people is because it saves the company money. They're easier to maintain. If you have to maintain a transmitter, it's easier to pull up with a lorry and a ladder, and go straight up, than into the middle of a field, with a four wheel drive truck, and reach one there. It's purely to do with profit.

    JCW: Let's go to Eric. Hi there Eric, you've got a question about different frequencies?
    Eric: Ja, hi Jenny, hi Barrie.
    BT: Good afternoon, sir.

    Barrie said that microwave frequency is 2.4 GHz, and I guess that's where most of the damage occurs, and I'm just wondering how far you have to move away from that frequency on either side before you can minimise damage, or is there no effect?
    BT: All of the...the microwave frequencies go from 300 Mhz to 300 GHz, and it's not so much the frequency, sir, it's the pulse frequency or the modulation frequency that they put with it. That tends to do most of the damage. So, it's not a question of the microwave frequency per se, it's a question of all of the pulse and modulation frequencies that carry the pictures, the movement, the sound.
    Those are the ones which are known to cause the damage, and I'm not blaming the industry here, they invent something, and there is nobody around that will say to them, hang on, you are picking a particularly dangerous pulse frequency or modulation frequency, change it. All the industry has to do, is turn to a government or turn to somebody like me, and say, would you comment. The problem is solvable, but, to answer your question, sir, it's really the modulation or the pulse frequency, the carrier waves that they put in, that tend to do most of the damage.

    JCW: All right, Eric, interesting questions, thank you. And here's another one, Themba asking this question: what are the effects of microwaves when using blue tooth in the car, which many of us do, and/or when the blue tooth device is actually on your person?
    BT: Two questions, the first you should never ever use a microwave transmitter inside a car, because they reflect all of the microwaves backwards and forwards and backwards and forwards, and you are effectively putting yourself into a microwave oven. That is the first thing. The other thing is that we know from experiments, and this has been published, that when you have microwaves near your brain, we know was carried out on children, and a child who used a microwave transmitter, an ordinary cell phone, for two minutes, had his natural brain waves disrupted for two hours afterwards. Now when you disrupt your natural brain waves, it's called entrainment, any personality change, depending which part of the brain you're changing, any personality change can occur, and that's just with two minutes. So if you have children in your car or you are using a blue tooth near your brain, you are effectively entraining your brain.
    Now if you are using your blue tooth for several minutes, then the chances are your brain will be entrained for many, many, many hours, and if you use a mobile phone and blue tooth, a mobile phone and blue tooth, on and off through the day, then your brain will not actually function properly and you could experience all sorts of neurological funny feelings, and I'm afraid this was the basis of my spy training and this is what they were used for.

    JCW: And lots more questions coming from listeners and I've also got some more questions, and if you've just tuned in, we're chatting to Barrie Trower, retired British military intelligence scientist, and he's here to answer your questions. He's out here as a guest of the electromagnetic radiation research foundation of South Africa, and I'll give you details of the talk that he is going to be giving. That's a talk, a public presentation this evening at seven pm, but I'll give you those details a little bit later on. All right, we're going to run out of time, but let's see how we go. Is there a minimum amount of texting that is safe for girls?
    BT: Uhm, the question is too hard for me to answer. The question really is like 'is there a minimum amount of cigarettes a child could smoke and stay safe'. There are so many complicated issues here, a girl may just text once, send the microwaves straight through her ovaries, and cause genetic damage, or she may text for a month and have no specific issues.

    JCW: So you just can't say.
    BT: The question is too hard to answer.

    JCW: You were saying to me a moment ago whilst we were off air that if a child uses a cell phone once a year, it's once too many. Is that not being too rigid, too melodramatic?
    BT: My own government has said that children should only use cell phones in a life and death emergency. Some countries, I believe Russia, actually ban
    children from using cell phones, but if we stick to the life and death emergency, if a child says to me 'I've used my cell phone once a year' I would say 'well you have a pretty rough life to have an emergency like that every year'. A child should not use a cell phone, only in a life and death emergency. And there are other medical issues that I don't have time to go through, to do with the immune system and the development of the nerves, but uhm, a child should not use a cell phone unless it's a life and death situation.

    JCW: And it should not, emphatically, the mast should not be sighted in a school ground.
    BT: Absolutely not, without a shadow of a doubt!

    JCW: Let's see if we can answer this question from Moira, hi there Moira.
    Moira: Hi uhm, hi Barrie and Jen.
    BT: Good afternoon ma'am.

    Moira: My question is, do satellite dishes emit, uhm, microwave radiation and I'm not talking about the home TV satellites, I'm talking about the 50 meter diameter satellite dishes, and the reason I ask is that I have an factory next door to an area that is like a satellite farm. I've been working there for 15 years and my health has deteriorated to the point where I can't even work anymore, with neurological problems and various health problems.
    BT: The easy answer to your question, ma'am is 'yes they can'.

    Moira: Is it the microwaves that are the problem? Because these are satellites that, I believe, some of them track satellites orbiting the earth and, uhm, two that are located about ten meters from my factory are at least 50 meters diameter.
    BT: If they're tracking satellites orbiting the earth, to be honest, it depends what the dish is there for and what it's doing. If it's tracking a satellite then nothing should be coming your way. If it is tracking a satellite picking up information and forwarding it to a cell tower...
    Moira: Yes, that's what it does.
    BT: ...or receive from a cell tower, if it's receiving from satellites and forwarding it to a cell tower, that is, generally, sort of in the form of a beam and if you are in the way of that beam then you are absolutely correct, ma'am, that could be the explanation of your illness, without a shadow of a doubt.

    Moira: And can it cause things like clinical depression and neurological problems? I've lost feeling...
    JCW: Okay Moira I can't be too explicit about that but Barrie will answer that question, thanks.
    BT: Yes.

    JCW: Okay. Fantastic, Barrie, you'll stay for a few minutes after the news?
    BT: Of course.

    JCW: Fantastic, that would be absolutely lovely, otherwise we're going to run out of time, we've got lots and lots of interesting questions coming our way, including the use of wifi which of course affects so many South Africans and so many people all around the world. In your house, in your car and in your office as well, so let's talk about that, and possibly ways to combat that. Let me slip in a question to Barrie before the news and he'll stay for about ten minutes after the news and hopefully get through all of your questions. Barrie, just a quick question, is it safer not to keep your cell phone next to your bed when you go to sleep at night?
    BT: Oh, absolutely! What happens, if you have your cell phone next to your bed, it is emitting microwaves if it is on standby. The microwaves go into the body and they influence a chemical known as melatonin. The melatonin goes around the body at night mopping up cancer cells that we can produce every day, so if your cell phone is on beside your bed when you are sleeping, which is the most dangerous time of the day, when you wake up, your immune system can be 40% less effective than when you went to bed.

    JCW: Really, so if you switch off that cell phone, not put it on silent, but if you switch it off, presumably, then it's okay because it's switched off?
    BT: Yes.

    JCW: Same as television sets in the bedroom?
    BT: Absolutely.

    JCW: Same with anything that is electronic?
    BT: Yes.

    JCW: Goodness. Okay, so there you go, there are some quick answers to some questions, but we'll take some of your other questions after the news. Stay with us, I think it is a vital conversation. I think it is an important conversation and just some information that Barrie has given me, that in Taiwan, 1,700 schools have actually taken out wifi. I think that's what we were talking about, they've actually got rid of it all together, very very interesting and we'll talk about that a little bit after the news, so please stay with us, talking to Barrie Trower. I mentioned just before the news that Taiwan had removed all sorts of things from school grounds, what I was talking about because it don't think I was clear, I was vague, has already removed 1,500 masts from school grounds or near their schools and that was as early as 2007 and yes there have been studies around masts in schools and it's coming up negative just about everywhere.
    Barrie, I asked you about the Bio-Initiative Report. I asked you about the World Health Organisation. What is the Ecolog study?
    BT: The Ecolog study was a study commissioned and run by the mobile industry itself, it was a very long study, I believe it was over ten years, with top world scientists. And, the conclusion to the Ecolog study, which is really the mobile industry researching its own product for health reasons and the conclusions were that low level microwaves can cause the cancer inducers and cancer promoters to act inside the body, in other words, they risk cancer and also there could be DNA damage.

    JCW: And that's the mobile industry itself?
    BT: Exactly.

    JCW: Now, you don't have a website.
    BT: No.

    JCW: But if people want to access your research, how do they go about that?
    BT: If they Google, my name is Barrie Trower, if you Google my name, nearly everything I have published or my lectures to governments, they're all on there, I hope they're all in simple to understandable English and you can download them for free.

    JCW: Alright, let's answer some other questions, we're going to be as quickly as we possibly can, Leonora, you've got a question?
    Leonora: Yes, please, I'd like to ask Barrie if amalgam fillings, metal fillings, be it amalgam or gold, as well as implants, titanium implants in teeth have any impact as far as using cell phones are concerned and cell phone towers?
    BT: You're absolutely correct, ma'am. Any metal inside the body will absorb microwaves and they will re-emit microwaves usually at a slightly different wavelength, but into the body and you can get quite a serious heating effect inside the body.

    JCW: Oh.
    Leonora: So experiencing pins and needles and that kind of effect, sensation, could possibly be due to that?
    BT: Oh, without a shadow of a doubt ma'am, you're correct.
    Leonora: Okay, all right, thank you for your answer.
    BT: My pleasure, ma'am.

    JCW: Stephanie, hello.
    Stephanie: Hi, Barrie, my question is, my children go to school outside of Johannesburg and they've had to go wireless with wifi because cables have been stolen, so the whole school is wireless. What - and they have been approached and the school said, 'well, prove it to us' - what could one, where could I go to, who could I speak to, to come and measure the radiation that is going on in that school - or would you say pull them out of the school, my children.
    BT: They say prove the wifi is dangerous...
    Stephanie: Yes.
    BT: You only have to quote the industry's own research in its own product. Uhmm, the, to me, if I had children at school, I would change schools to a school that didn't have wifi, personally. I wouldn't run the risk with my daughter having a genetically damaged child.
    Stephanie: Yeah, okay, thank you so much.
    BT: My pleasure ma'am.

    JCW: Alright, and it's the Ecolog study that we're talking about here. Just some quick answers, my husband works at cell masts every day, what are the implications for him?
    BT: Wear protective clothing, very, very good protective clothing, when you are going up or near a transmitter.

    JCW: My three year old boy plays games on my cell phone daily. Is it safe for him to continue or should I stop him?
    BT: If the cell phone is just being used like a simple calculator for games, there is no problem. If it is transmitting somewhere then there is a problem.

    JCW: Will car radios have the same effect on you, turning a car into a microwave, if I turn on my car radio? Is that a problem?
    BT: You should never , ever have microwave radiation inside a car, not ever. Never ever.

    JCW: Even if it's an old cell phone?
    BT: Especially if it's an old cell phone.

    JCW: Uhm, new cell pone mast is about 300 meters away beaming into my five year old daughters bedroom, would planting trees help?
    BT: No.

    JCW: Uhm, the recommended 1.5 km radius around a cell phone mast, and where it is safe for you to be, is that higher when 4G technology is released?
    BT: It will be much higher and much more complicated, can I go back please just to the lady with the four year old daughter?
    JCW: Yes.
    BT: Uhm, one of the things you can do, cause not everybody can move house, one thing you can do, if you get some thin tin or thick aluminum, not cooking foil, and if you remember going back when ladies would go behind screens if they had to undress for doctors, that sort of thing, if you build screens and you put the aluminum or tin, on the screen, shiny side to the transmitter and put it between the transmitter and the child's bed, then you are shielding the child.

    JCW: Oh well, then that's absolutely, that's what she's got to do.
    BT: Yes.

    JCW: Because she simply can't do it in... but, you probably got to do it on all the walls in the house.
    BT: Only the walls facing the transmitter.

    JCW: Okay. Alright, so don't forget you can go along and Google Barrie and get a whole lot of the stuff that we've been speaking about, and the questions that we've been getting about 'are animals affected', well they've got the same cellular structure that we have, of course they are affected in the same kind of a way. But, maybe this is the last question we're going to take, Amanda, you are asking the 64 thousand dollar question...

    Amanda: What is the solution?
    BT: That is a brilliant question, ma'am and thank you for asking it. There is a solution, is that the governments and the industry follow the Bio-Initiative safety level, that is all. All they have to do is turn the knob down to a safe level, and that is the solution.
    Amanda: Simple

    And you can access that, by the way Mandy, it's called the Bio-Initiative Report.
    Amanda: Thank you, I will do.

    JCW: Okay, so, cause I think that that might be vital for many, many people listening. Now we could go on and on and on, but we can't so Barrie is giving a public presentation this evening. It's at 7 pm and it's at Fourways high school which is Kingfisher Drive in Fourways and this really and truly is, it's a unique opportunity to hear more about what is really known about the dangers of cell phones and other wireless technology that we are all involved in in one way or another. The health damage it is causing, the legal battles around the world that are being fought to actually address this issue. And this is open to all members of the public and it is free. So that is 7 pm at Fourways high school, Kingfisher Drive in Fourways. We're talking to Barry Trower and he is consulting to governments and other authorities around the world on the health risks of microwave exposure. And you can Google him and you can get your hands on some of his research, which is all put up there and that will amplify some of the things that we've been speaking about today. But, Barrie, thank you, very sobering conversation.
    BT: My pleasure, ma'am, thank you very much for your courtesy.
    JCW: Thank you.

    Original transcript:
    Download interview hier (mp3)

    Last edited by TRANCOSO on Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:56 pm; edited 4 times in total

    Posts : 616
    Join date : 2010-04-13
    Location : The Shire of Wilts

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Swanny on Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:48 am

    I have a blue tooth hands free kit in my car :( And a blue tooth headset for my PS3 :(

    Posts : 118
    Join date : 2010-04-08

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Adv on Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:49 am

    I haven't read it all, but threads like these keep people coming back.

    Thank you !

    Posts : 3931
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  TRANCOSO on Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:06 pm

    Adv wrote:I haven't read it all, but threads like these keep people coming back.
    Thank you !
    Thanx Adv. I'll edit it a bit more when I've got time.

    Also, I've posted a thread in the 'UFO' section, titled 'The Link'.
    'The Link'
    is a Free download book/pdf about Niburu, 2012, The Anunaki, safe havens, etc.
    I'm halfway reading it & I can really recomend it to you all.
    Lots of information & well written.

    That doesn't mean I believe everything that's in it, but there's also a lot of stuff that goes beyond the 'True - Not True' issue.

    Read and download 'The Link' (the whole e-book) here:

    Posts : 22784
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Carol on Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:02 pm

    Hmm, the past few weeks I've been getting almost daily headaches which is very unusual for me as I'm not prone to this and wondered if it was because of the increase EM from solar output. I remember reading where the earths shield is getting thinner of almost non existant in some areas of the planet.

    I also notice that these are normal headaches but something that is experienced when energetic frequencies are increasing when in a deeper state of meditation just prior to moving out of body. Anyway... it's increasing and doesn't make any difference when in Hawaii or NE Oregon which on one hand seems odd. There is an external pulse to the sensation, similar to standing in the field of zero point where it all pulses.

    I just am wondering if others are noticing physical symptoms of one sort or another in the past few weeks? In addition, there also seems to be an increase in the feeling state when near others in distress where sensitivity to others is enhanced.

    Also, T, thank you for posting the link to the LINK as that sounds very interesting as well.

    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

    truth and integrity

    Posts : 373
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Canada

    How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects the Brain

    Post  truth and integrity on Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:21 am

    Hmm……I have noticed that in the past few weeks I was getting tired. I have also experienced increased emotional sensitivity that I couldn’t understand. Well, I don’t like it but it is good to be aware of other influences that can affect us.

    Posts : 3931
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  TRANCOSO on Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:46 am


    The Cell Phone Poisoning Of America (pdf)

    Posts : 616
    Join date : 2010-04-13
    Location : The Shire of Wilts

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Swanny on Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:05 am

    There is no way to escape from this smog
    Even if you have no phone or wi-fi everyone else has so you share theirs

    Posts : 3451
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Age : 51
    Location : Walking the Path...

    A Document for Y'all

    Post  Mercuriel on Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:43 am

    New World Order and ELF Psychotronic Tyranny

    Heh heh


    Peace, Light, Love, Harmony and Unity...

    Posts : 3451
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Age : 51
    Location : Walking the Path...

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Mercuriel on Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:47 am

    I'm not sure if Y'all have this one I Uploaded a while back so heres the Link to It as well...

    Frequency Weapons and Mind Control



    Peace, Light, Love, Harmony and Unity...

    Posts : 3931
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  TRANCOSO on Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:39 pm

    America's Nuclear Nazis And The Radiation State
    By Amy Worthington

    Despotic governments throughout the ages have often forced their subjugated masses to strip naked since forcing a captive population to nakedness is the ultimate physical & psychological degradation. With equal barbarism, the US government is organizing a campaign to obtain naked images of millions of Americans traveling through US airports. Even young children will be trained to think it normal for adult strangers wearing badges to demand a probing view of our bodies under clothing.

    This authoritarian nightmare is residue from September 11, 2001, when criminal elements of our own government perpetrated the most heinous, genocidal hoax of our age. That was the day the Twin Towers and Building 7 of the World Trade Center were obliterated by thermite incendiaries and other explosives for maximum psychological impact while federal officials blamed foreign terrorists.

    Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of over 1000 architects and engineers, offers technical papers detailing evidence that the three WTC towers were deliberately demolished with pre-installed explosives. These professionals are calling for a grand jury investigation of federal agencies which, they say, used insufficient and fraudulent data to perpetrate a blatant cover-up. (1) John Farmer, former senior counsel to the 9-11 Commission has admitted in his book, The Ground Truth, that government officials agreed not to tell the people the truth about what happened. (2) Ironically, the 9-11 cover-up is the reason why American travelers will forfeit the right to keep their naked bodies covered up.

    It is pertinent to our predicament that leading U.S. corporations were secretly funding and supplying the German Nazi Wehrmacht throughout WWII (3) and that legions of Nazi functionaries were transplanted to U.S. intelligence and science posts after the war. (4) Is it by accident that buildings at the U.S. Naval Base at Coronado outside of San Diego have been constructed in the shape of a swastika, as confirmed by aerial views? (5)

    The 9-11 project was to George W. Bush what the Reichstag fraud was to Adolph Hitler. This is not surprising since progenitors of Bushwere deeply involved in funding the Hitler project. (6) The regimes of both George Bush Jr. and his successor define modern fascism: a centralized autocratic government, belligerent nationalism and glorification of war, with American youth groomed to become heroes by goose-stepping off to bomb and occupy nations holding the coveted resources of oil and opium.

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), conceived along with the 9-11 hoax, is rapidly building an American police state with unlimited surveillance and tracking capabilities. DHS is not merely content to Stasi-watch our every move through CCTV cameras and spy drones, read our e-mails, scrutinize our bank transactions, monitor our phone calls, peruse our Facebook confessions and database the GPS coordinates of our front doors. These hyperactive inquisitors have finally gotten their ever-dredging noses into our underpants.

    This Fascisti triumph, unleashed by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), involves full-body scanners being installed at 450 major airports across the nation. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) reports that DHS is requesting an additional 500 body scanners under new federal surveillance initiatives budgeted for FY 2011. EPIC notes: "In 2009, the TSA announced that Whole Body Imaging would replace metal detectors at airport security check points. This is a marked departure from the earlier promises by the agency that the technology would only be used for secondary screening of air travel passengers." (7) Once all of the older style metal detector portals are removed - probably by the end of 2011 - those wishing to fly will have no choice but to undergo naked-body scanning.


    There are two types of ‘strip off’ machines which have been, or will soon be installed at airport gauntlets: The backscatter scanners, used to create ghost-like images of the human body under clothing, emit ionizing x-radiation to penetrate human flesh at least a quarter inch deep. Airport procedure requires at least two scans to cover front and back, with each scan lasting up to 8 seconds. Additional lateral scans can also be administered. Ionizing x-radiation is a proven carcinogen. It breaks molecular bonds and damages DNA. Strip scanners use even higher ionizing energy than medical x-rays. (8)

    The millimeter scanners, used to create a three-dimensional holographic image of the body under clothing, bombard human flesh with ultra short radio frequency waves that lie on the electromagnetic spectrum between microwaves and x-rays. Millimeter waves, propagated in the very high gigahertz range, are documented to damage DNA. (9) This elevates millimeter waves to carcinogen status.

    Also looming on the horizon are powerful transmission system scanners that use potent ionizing x-ray beams to deeply examine the internal structures of the body for detection of swallowed objects or those hidden in body cavities. Little information is currently available on the new foot scanners soon coming to airports.

    EPIC has obtained TSA documents revealing that full-body airport scanning machines have both image storage and image transfer capabilities. (10) Computer software is said to allow scan images to be inverted from negatives to actual naked body photos. (11) DHS assurances that the scans will not be saved or compromised are as reliable as its assurances that the technologically demanding feats of 9-11 were perpetrated by cavemen with box cutters.


    Americans, as a group, are not immensely healthy these days. They are cancer-ridden, Alzheimer's afflicted, prone to high rates of heart disease and diabetes, chronically fatigued, stunned by carcinogenic wireless devices and drubbed by continuous exposure to MRIs, CAT scans, dental panograms, Wi-Fi and cell tower microwaves. Additional doses of airport ionizing and millimeter radiation will only add to public health deterioration.

    Medical experts agree that cancers begin with damaged DNA. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) explains: "When cells become old or damaged, they die and are replaced with new cells. However, sometimes this orderly process goes wrong. The genetic material of a cell (DNA) can become damaged or changed, producing mutations that affect normal cell growth or division. When this happens, cells do not die when they should and new cells form when the body does not need them. The extra cells may form a mass of tissue called a tumor." (12)

    Even a single DNA mutation can lay the groundwork for development of any of over 200 types of tumors and blood cancers. This means that full-body scanning, administered by non-medical airport personnel, is a treacherous assault against the public health. The American Cancer Society (ACS) confirms, "Ionizing radiation has been shown to induce (cause) cancer in many different species of animals and in almost all parts of the body. It is one of the few scientifically proven carcinogens." (13)

    Some compare airport scanning radiation to background radiation from the sun, or from high altitude flying. But Dr. John Gofman, MD, Professor Emeritus of molecular and cell biology who gained his expertise as biomedical director of Livermore Labs under the Atomic Energy Commission, has stated, "Usually, when exposure to x-rays is compared with 'a day in the sun' or 'a day at the beach,' the mistaken assumption is that ultra violet light from the sun is comparable to the penetrating photons of x-rays and gamma rays. The assumption is mistaken. Because ultraviolet light does not penetrate past the skin, it does not cause cancer of internal organs." (14)

    Federal officials minimize airport scan exposure by insisting that the radiation is ‘low dose’. But in 2005, an expert panel of the National Academy of Sciences rejected arguments that low dose radiation is safe. The panel noted that radiation damage is cumulative, and it made these important assertions: Studies show even very low doses of ionizing radiation pose a risk of cancer over a person's lifetime. It is unlikely that there is a threshold of radiation exposure below which cancers are not induced. (15)

    Female travelers subjected to airport scanning are at special risk. Monumental medical studies completed by Dr. Gofman indicate that medical x-radiation is an overlooked co-factor in the initiation of breast cancer. (16) Why must millions of non-violent girls and women be subjected to increased breast cancer risk from
    airport backscatter scanners in order to "avert terrorism"? Is it not perverse satisfaction to America's enemies that DHS and TSA are adding fuel to the fire of our raging breast cancer epidemic?

    Considering the long-established fact that any amount of ionizing radiation is dangerous to fetuses and children, the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety in Europe now advises that pregnant women and children should NOT be exposed to backscatter x-ray security scanners at all. (17) This committee includes experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Agency, World Health Organization and the European Commission.

    Using ACS's 2009 statistics for both malignant tumors and skin cancers, we calculate that every day another 6500 Americans receive a new cancer diagnosis. The second leading cause of death for American kids is cancer. What kind of government would subject children to frivolous ionizing x-ray radiation in the name of ‘security’? The same gang that obliterated the World Trade Center towers before trapped and injured people could be rescued.

    Millimeter radiation is called terahertz (THz) or T-waves. Man-made T-waves are propagated at an energy level of billions of hertz. While technical definitions of the terahertz frequency band vary, starting at 30 billion hertz, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) defines millimeter radiation as waves that oscillate at 110 to 300 billion hertz.

    DHS claims that millimeter energy used by airport scanners is thousands of times less powerful than a cell phone transmission. But it is certainly powerful enough to penetrate clothing and produce x-ray-like images. Researchers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory reported in 2009 that even a tiny resonant force exerted by T-waves can "unzip double-stranded DNA" creating bubbles of damage. The researchers postulate that such damage can significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. (18)

    European universities conducting research on terahertz radiation concluded that it may cause molecular damage by a mechanism known as "resonant absorption." (19) Chinese research has demonstrated that terahertz frequencies at various non-thermal power densities produce "cumulative effects" on many biological systems, including the brain. Studies presented at an international radiation conference in 2004 noted that millimeter radiation especially causes "a decrease in learning capacity and memory." (20)

    Japanese medical researchers reported in 2009 that millimeter wave exposure can cause "acute ocular injuries." Their study states: "These findings indicated that three types of millimeter wave antennas can cause thermal injuries of varying types and levels. The thermal effects induced by millimeter waves can apparently penetrate below the surface of the eye." (21) Even if airport millimeter scanner waves inflict non-thermal (non-tissue heating) power densities, we know that non-thermal microwaves, which are far less energetic than millimeter waves, can cause the formation of non-operable cataracts in the human eye. (22)

    T-waves should not be forced upon any human who wishes to reproduce healthy children. Faulty DNA replication and faulty gene expression have everything to do with miscarriages and birth defects. How many American women who don't know they are pregnant will be T-waved at US airports? How many ova cells in female ovaries will be subjected to terahertz DNA-unzipping before adequate medical research finally forbids this travesty?


    Safer air travel through full-body scanning is an oxymoron. How do you make airline passengers ‘safe’ by destroying their cellular mechanisms and initiating genetic damage, cancer and other degenerative conditions? If nuked-to-naked scanning really has to do with air safety, why have at least 65,000 U.S. flights over the last six years been allowed to take off with unresolved safety problems, (23) putting millions of air passengers at risk?

    TSA's radiation assault has been enervated by the so-called underwear bomber, a 23-year-old Nigerian Muslim named Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. A passenger on Northwest Flight 253 from Amsterdam, Abdulmutallab packed his undies with explosive chemicals, then set himself on fire shortly before the plane landed in Detroit on Christmas day, 2009. Abdulmatullab was able to execute this stunt, even though his father, a former Nigerian official, had earlier warned U.S. authorities about his son's extremist activities. (24)

    Why did a ‘sharp dressed’ man escorting Abdulmutallab convince Amsterdam security officials to allow Mr. A. to board flight 253 without a valid passport, as witnessed by other passengers? (25) Since the U.S. National Counter Terrorism Center had Abdulmutallab on its Terror Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) roster, why did DHS - so keen to probe granny's crannies - allow him keep a valid visa for the USA? If DHS wanted to ‘watch’ Abdulmatullab in order to gain information on his networks, as the U.S. State Department is now insisting, (26) why didn't our over-zealous security apparatus assign a sky marshal to his aircraft? The Abdulmatullab case brings to mind how 9/11 ‘terrorist’ agents were allowed to do their ‘thing’ over a span of several hours with virtually no effective U.S. military response until massive destruction of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon building was fait accompli. Flight 253 had to be yet another fake terrorist demonstration.

    The 9-11 hoax has key players within its directorate. Michael Chertoff appears to be among the most powerful of such reprobates. Chertoff was co-author of the infamous Patriot Act, a blueprint for totalitarian surveillance government as passed in hysteria by Congress immediately after 9/11. While assistant attorney general at the Department of Justice, Chertoff conveniently traced the 9/11 attacks to Al Qaeda, a network used for decades by U.S. intelligence agencies to smuggle arms and drugs. As the second secretary of DHS, Chertoff facilitated the compilation of Soviet-style secret databases on millions of Americans in violation of the Constitution and the Privacy Act of 1974.

    Now a vocal promoter of full-body scanning, Chertoff heads a consulting group representing security technology corporations. Among his clients is Rapiscan Systems, a corporate megalith with lucrative federal contracts to supply and install airport scanning equipment. (27) A report by the Washington Examiner reveals that Chertoff is joined by a clique of other former federal officials, working within the corporate ‘security’ racket to cash in on invasive airport scanning. (28) Engendering lucrative new ‘security’ contracts and a sharp rise in related technology stock prices, the underwear bomber turned out to be a mighty good Christmas gift for that bunch. This conflict of interest demonstrates the hallmark of fascism: a blurring of the lines of demarcation between government agencies and corporate networks.

    Naked-body scanning has been a proverbial frog-boiling project; in measured steps, the pot has been heated. Headlines warning that airline passengers would soon be forced to ‘bare all’ as they pass through airport security have been desensitizing Americans to the idea of digital strip search since 2001. On September 14, only three days after 9/11, ABC News revealed that Rapiscan and others were ready to market both x-ray and millimeter airport scanners. (29) In 2003, TSA announced its intention to use the technology and by 2007, it was running pilot programs to test passengers' psychological reactions. In 2008, TSA launched its CastScope pilot program, soliciting volunteers with casts, prosthetic devices and braces to yield up their encumbered parts to experimental backscatter x-ray investigation. Beginning in 2009, radiation scanners have been presented as primary surveillance at airports in San Francisco, Miami, Albuquerque, Tulsa, Salt Lake City and Las Vegas. Reports from travelers reveal they were not made aware that they could request a pat down, rather than risk radiation exposure.

    While the older style baggage scanning and metal detection portals for passengers have proven effective in preventing the smuggling of metal weapons aboard aircraft, security officials argue that the portals do not detect low-density materials used for bombs. But the British government suggests that naked-body scanners have also been found unreliable in detecting plastics, chemicals and liquids like those the underwear bomber had stuffed into his briefs. British expert Ben Wallace, an MP involved with development of new scanning technology, has stated that full-body scanners were "unlikely to have detected the Christmas Day Bomb." (30)

    For lubrication of what will certainly in the near future become mandatory strip searching using carcinogenic technology, a lengthy report was prepared by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). (31) Authors of the report include agents of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration.

    The ruminations of this monstrous document place it in the category of Dr. Mengele's Nazi concentration camp experiments.Using NCRP's outdated and dangerous exposure calculations, the report concludes that zapping an individual annually with 2500 ionizing security backscatter scans (at 0.1 microsievert per scan) lies within officially acceptable parameters. The committee's recommendation for fetus exposure to ionizing security scans is scandalous: a monthly equivalent dose of fifty ionizing scans for the embryo or fetus of radiation workers (those who administer airport security, for example) half that many ionizing scans per month for fetuses of the general public. The NCRP report notes that the FDA had requested consideration of ‘informed consent’ for airport scanning. But the NCRP committee found that "the effective doses that would be received from the scanning devices considered in this report are at a level at which the 'consent' aspect of informed consent would not be indicated." Of course, the "consent aspect" was not"indicated" for those liquidated by Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler and the 9-11 perpetrators,

    The NRCP report is a perfect illustration of what political commentator Dr. Henry Giroux calls "new modes of authoritarian policy" which can manifest in degrees "to create conditions for a distinctly undemocratic and increasingly cruel and oppressive social order." (32) What is more cruel, oppressive and Nazi-like than blackmailing travelers with non-consensual airport radiation which has documented potential to inflict illness and even premature death?

    Media reports featured on the TSA website claim that the majority of Americans passing through naked-body scanners are pleased to allow TSA inquisitors an intimate inspection of their genitals, mastectomies, implants, catheters and colostomy bags. Continually brainwashed with fake terrorist theater, and under-informed about the hazards of radiation exposure, many have been convinced to submit to zap by DNA-busting zap, without so much as a bleat.

    Nazi tanks will roll until Nazi tanks are stopped. The denigrating and ineffective radiation scanning project could be derailed overnight by popular dissent. Sustained and cacophonous objections voiced to legislators and airline companies would accomplish wonders. People should be demanding pat-downs and refusing scans until independent studies PROVE there are no biological effects, or until scanner manufacturers issue guarantees that they will indemnify the public for health damage.

    A population lacking the will and courage to DEMAND THE PROHIBITION of unreasonable and unnecessary searches will find itself endlessly irradiated while "security" racketeers laugh all the way to the bank. The airport radiation experiment foreshadows future authoritarian radiation disasters. As the Nuke Nazis become increasingly emboldened by lack of popular dissent, mandatory millimeter and backscatter x-ray inspection of our private parts could become a routine requirement for entering ground transportation, all government buildings, schools, hospitals
    and other public institutions where "security" is deemed more important than human health and child welfare.

    The NCRP report discloses: "Technologies employing ionizing radiation to image illicit materials will continue to evolve. Smaller versions of cargo scanners using radio nuclides that emit gamma rays are being developed for security screening of
    individuals. An idea that has been considered involves scanning vehicles and their occupants at customs checkpoints or even at the approach of a vulnerable bridge or tunnel. Covert systems capable of scanning a vehicle traveling at five to 30 mph are possible. Systems may be disguised within decorative portals for the covert screening of individuals passing through the portals."

    History is replete with horrors that reverberate upon the fate of modern Americans who now queue up to board aeronautical cattle cars. Is the past predestined to repeat itselfagain? A woman with a reconstructed breast blogged about her experience with airport security in early 2010: "A funny thing happened to me at airport security this week. After I sauntered sleepily through the regular scanner at the Denver International Airport, the TSA guy motioned me into the clear, cylindrical, full-body scanner (aka the Millimeter Wave). The woman there asked me to step on the yellow footprints and raise my arms above my head. She murmured into a headset to start the scanShe asked me to turn, step on the green footprints and hold my arms straight out. Another scan." (34)

    How creepy is it that some "TSA guy" can select at random those required to submit to a ray-driven genital exam that amounts to DNA rape? If people don't wake up, the worst is yet to come. Modern fascism and intrusive radiation technology are a potent mix. Today, the Radiation State can dehumanize and soft-kill useless eaters, over-populators and specially-targeted ethnic groups slowly, incrementally without reproach.

    Mass genocide just ain't what it used to be. Neighborhood round-ups and grisly train rides to the death camps are no longer necessary. While old time de-pop programs were messy and conspicuous, the airport project is squeaky clean. Neither firearms nor torture instruments are needed to induce cooperation. The docile masses shuffle so submissively to the ‘final solution’ that nary a cattle prod is necessary. For those who over two centuries ago fought the American revolution for freedom, privacy, human dignity and the right to life, we think that a fitting state of the nation report for 2010 would be this: Incontrovertible physical evidence indicates that criminal elements of our federal government perpetrated horrendous terrorist acts against the people of the United States on September 11, 2001. Thousands of citizens were murdered in cold blood that day. Using this infamous project as a springboard for the radical authoritarian restructuring of our economic and political institutions, this same DARK FORCE is unleashing surveillance technology that is potentially lethal to the rest of us.

    "We've come a long, long ways, baby!"


    1. See www.ea911.truth for the whole story.
    2. The Ground Truth: The Untold Story of America Under attack on 9-11, John Farmer, 2009. "The Ground Truth draws on Farmer's experience with the 9/11 Commission as well as recently declassified tapes and transcripts to show a disturbing disconnect between what those in charge of the country's security knew and what was actually happening on the ground and in the skies. At some level of government," says Dean Farmer, "at some point in time, a decision was made not to tell the truth about the national response to the attacks on the morning of 9/11. We owe the truth to the families of the victims of 9/11."
    3. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Dr. Antony Sutton, Buccaneer Books, 1999; also: Trading with the Enemy: The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949, Charles
    Higham, 2007.
    4. See Wikipedia: Operation Paperclip.
    5. U-Tube: US Naval Base Coronado, CA: Survey of Site Using Google Earth
    Satellite Imagery.
    6. "How Bush's Grandfather Helped Hitler Rise to Power," The Guardian, UK., B. Aris and D. Campbell, 8-31-05. also "The Best Enemies Money Can Buy," Michael C. Ruppert,, 10-9-2001; also "Bush Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951--Federal Documents," J. Buchanan and S. Michael, The New
    Hampshire Gazette, Vol. 248, No. 3, 11-7-03; also George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography, Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin, Executive Intelligence Review, 1992.
    7. EPIC-Electronic Privacy Information Center, "Whole Body Imaging Technology and Body Scanners: "Backscatter" X-Ray and Millimeter Wave Screening," pp. 2-5
    8. Ibid.
    9. "How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA," Technology Review, 10-30-09,
    10. EPIC-Electronic Privacy Information Center, "Whole Body Imaging Technology and Body Scanners: "Backscatter" X-Ray and Millimeter Wave Screening," p. 3
    11. "The Health Risks of Naked Body Scanners," Bob Livingston, 1-25-10. Instructions for turning airport scan images into porno: "Airport Scanners-What Do They Really Show Your Big Brother, and the Internet?" The Missing Report-News
    and Links,
    12. "What is Cancer?" The National Cancer Institute,
    13. "Radiation Exposure and Cancer," The American Cancer Society,
    14. "X-ray Imaging: The Fallacy of the 'Day in the Sun' Comparison," Dr. John
    Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., and Egan O'Connor, The X-rays and Health Project,
    15. "Panel Affirms Radiation Link to Cancer," Associated Press, 06-29-05.
    16. Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population, Dr.
    John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., 1999.
    17. "Airport Body Scanning Raises Radiation Exposure Committee Says," J. Tirone,
    18. "How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA," Technology Review, 10-30-09,
    19. Terahertz Bridge: Terahertz Radiation in Biological Research, Investigation on Diagnostics and Study on Potential Genotoxic Effects, EU Commission Programme, "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources" Key Action 4, 2004.
    20. "Mechanism of Non-Thermally (sic) Biological Effect of Millimeterwaves of its
    Properties," Pang Xio-feng et al., Institute of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; also "Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on Animals: Review of Chinese Papers" G. Guozhen et al., Radiation Medicine Department, the Fourth Military Medical University.
    21. "Acute Ocular Injuries Caused by 60-GHz Milllimeter Wave Exposure," M. Kojima et al., Division of Vision Research for Environmental Health, Kanazawa
    Medical University, 2009 Sep;97(3) 212-8.
    22. The Microwave Debate, Nicholas Staneck, 1984, p. 162. As shown by researcher Dr. Milton Zaret, non-thermal microwave radiation cataracts present as cataract degradation of the back surface of the eye lens from a "delayed radiational effect."
    23. "Planes with Maintenance Problems Have Flown Anyway," USA Today 02-04-10.
    24. "US no-fly List Criticized After Attempted Plane Bombing," Los Angeles Times,
    25. "The Truth about Flight 253 Has Been Revealed," Kurt Haskell, 01-29-09, Kurt Haskell and his wife Lori were among passengers on flight 253 who witnessed the '"sharp dressed man" facilitating Abdulmatullab's boarding of Flight 253 without a valid passport.
    26. "Terror Suspect Kept Visa to Avoid Tipping Off Larger Investigation," Detroit
    News, 01-27-10.
    27. "US no-fly List Criticized After Attempted Plane Bombing," Los Angeles Times, 12-31-09.
    28. "The Airport Scanner Scam," J. Ridgeway, Mother Jones, 01-04-10.
    29. New Technology to Boost Airport Security, ABC, 09-14-01.
    30. "Are Airport Scanners Just a Scam?" J. Merrick, The Independent, UK, 01-03-10.
    31. Presidential Report on Radiation Protection Advice: Screening of Humans for
    Security Purposes, Using Ionizing Radiation Scanning Systems, A Report Prepared by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland, 11-26-02.
    32. "Democracy and the Threat of Authoritarianism: Politics Beyond Barack Obama," Henry Giroux,, 02-15-10.
    33. Presidential Report on Radiation Protection Advice: Screening of Humans for
    Security Purposes, op cit.
    34. "My Left Breast Put Fancy TSA Scanner to the Test,"

    Note: For excellent information on the Whole Body Imaging used at airports, go to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) at and the Privacy Coalition at

    Be sure to visit the website of Architects and Engineers
    for 9-11 Truth at

    Last edited by TRANCOSO on Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:33 am; edited 1 time in total

    Posts : 18739
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 63
    Location : belgium

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  mudra on Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:46 am

    Confidential report on TETRA Mad 3

    Love Always

    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2011-04-04

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  restoration on Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:20 am

    I recently came across your forum and have been reading along. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice forum. I will keep visiting this forum very often.
    Miami water damage restoration

    Posts : 1867
    Join date : 2011-02-28
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Sanicle on Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:38 am

    mudra wrote:Confidential report on TETRA Mad 3

    Love Always

    Wow, that report covers everything..mobiles, phones, HAARP, etc. Thanks Mudra. I love you

    Posts : 18739
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 63
    Location : belgium

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  mudra on Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:44 pm

    Olle Johansson "Health effects of electromagnetic fields"

    Olle Johansson at the Open Mind Conference 2014, Copenhagen.

    "Health effects of electromagnetic fields" Olle Johansson is associate professor at the Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

    He is a leading authority in the field of EMF radiation and health effects. He has also been a professor in basic and clinical neuroscience at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm.

    He has published more than 650 original articles, reviews, book chapters and conference reports within the field of basic and applied neuroscience, dermatoscience and health effects of electromagnetic fields.

    His studies have been widely recognised in the media, including newspapers, radio and TV, as well as on the Internet, both nationally and internationally. He has on-going international scientific collaborations with e.g. Japan, Brazil, South Africa, Serbia, Germany, the UK and the USA.

    Olle Johansson’s presentation covers the historic background of electricity and electromagnetic fields, how suspicions arose early on concerning fields and signals producing negative health effects and how this led to today's global public discussion about the subject. It will also touch upon the functional impairment electro hypersensitivity.

    The lecture will go into depth about the scientific research results regarding the health effects of electromagnetic fields and the urgent need for independent research projects that need to be initiated to ensure our public health.

    These projects should be entirely independent of all types of commercial interests as public health cannot have a price-tag. This is the responsibility of the democratically elected body of every country.

    The body of evidence on EMF requires a new approach to protection of public health; the growth and development of the fetus, and of children; and argues for strong preventative actions. These conclusions are built upon prior scientific and public health reports documenting the following:

    1) Low-intensity (non-thermal) bioeffects and adverse health effects are demonstrated at levels significantly below existing exposure standards.

    2) ICNIRP and IEEE/FCC public safety limits are inadequate and obsolete with respect to prolonged, low-intensity exposures.

    3) New, biologically-based public exposure standards are urgently needed to protect public health world-wide. 4) It is not in the public interest to wait.

    Love Always

    Posts : 18739
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 63
    Location : belgium

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  mudra on Tue Mar 10, 2015 5:17 pm

    Professor Martin Pall- How WIFI & other EMFs Cause Biological Harm

    Love Always

    Posts : 4
    Join date : 2015-07-21

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  Zephoria on Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:05 am

    TRANCOSO, thank you for your very informative thread and helpful links from yourself and other members posts.  It seems we are all sensitive to EMR in one form or another. We are after all empathic in varying levels.

    Posts : 18739
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 63
    Location : belgium

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  mudra on Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:28 am

    Hi there Zephoria,
    It is very nice to see you here newly arrived and already sharing your thoughts with us.
    You are most welcome in the Mists Cheerful
    How did you find us and why did you decide to join us ?

    I wish you a great time on our ship.

    Love from me


    Posts : 1851
    Join date : 2014-01-31
    Age : 67
    Location : Druid county UK

    Re: How Electromagnetic Radiation Effects The Brain

    Post  B.B.Baghor on Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:03 am

    Here are recommendations for protection agains electrosmog and environmental energy disturbances and unbalance.
    See also today's post in the thread "The combined works of Tesla, Rudolf Steiner, Hermann Hesse and more....

      Current date/time is Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:18 pm